ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] JAS


Thanks Kristina, and thanks for copying Olivier so that ALAC is aware of your 
request.

Stéphane



Le 6 mai 2011 à 23:16, Rosette, Kristina a écrit :

> I would prefer that it not go to the Board until we've reviewed and acted on. 
>  (I have no objection to our commenting via list, but we'd have to have a 
> formal motion and we can't do that until the 19th, right?)  
> 
> If ALAC nonetheless forwards, the report should clearly indicate, via front 
> cover black box (or something equally visually prominent), that the GNSO has 
> not yet acted on the report (or received it, for that matter, if that's true 
> at the time).
> 
> K 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
> Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder
> Sent: Friday, May 06, 2011 2:23 PM
> To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx GNSO
> Cc: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
> Subject: [council] JAS
> 
> 
> Councillors,
> 
> Just a heads up on a conversation I had today with ALAC Chair Olivier Crepin 
> Leblond.
> 
> The JAS group is apparently ready with its final report and ALAC would like 
> to send it to the Board asap. The deadline for consideration at the next 
> Board meeting is May 9 (yes, that's this Monday). ALAC could apparently make 
> this deadline.
> 
> I explained to Olivier that there was no way the GNSO could have that a quick 
> a turnaround (also bearing in mind the fact that we have not had the report 
> from the JAS group yet).
> 
> I indicated that, depending on when we get the report, the earliest we could 
> consider it is at our next meeting (May 19). I also said that I thought the 
> GNSO would prefer that the report not be forwarded by ALAC before we had had 
> a chance to see it, although I did not know that for sure. But I told Olivier 
> of our recent experiences with the JIG and the ccNSO.
> 
> Please do not hesitate to comment. Do you think we can move faster? Should 
> we? Rafik, your thoughts on this are of course very much appreciated, as I am 
> only painting the picture from what I understand the situation to be, and may 
> be wrong.
> 
> Thanks and a great weekend to you all.
> 
> Stéphane
> 
> 
> 
> 





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>