<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] Public Comment: Proposal for Renewal of the .NET Registry Agreement
- To: Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] Public Comment: Proposal for Renewal of the .NET Registry Agreement
- From: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 02:56:15 -0700
- Accept-language: fr-FR, en-US
- Acceptlanguage: fr-FR, en-US
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: Acv499yaiA8Udjz1TL2eNPNuegp4Bg==
- Thread-topic: Public Comment: Proposal for Renewal of the .NET Registry Agreement
http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-11apr11-en.htm
Public Comment: Proposal for Renewal of the .NET Registry Agreement
11 April 2011
ICANN is today posting a proposed draft renewal agreement for the operation of
the .NET registry. The current .NET Registry Agreement is due to expire on 30
June 2011.
ICANN's gTLD registry agreements provide for presumptive renewal so long as
certain requirements are met. The agreements also provide that upon renewal,
changes may be made in the agreement to render the terms similar to other
comparable agreements. The proposed renewal agreement from Verisign includes
modified provisions to bring the .NET agreement into line with other comparable
agreements (e.g. BIZ, COM, INFO, ORG), including terms such as traffic data,
limitation of liability, indemnification, assignment, and notice provisions.
In addition to the changes to bring .NET into conformance with other
agreements, Verisign has requested a change to give more flexibility for the
registry to take action to prevent the registration of particular domain names
when necessary in order to protect the security and stability of the DNS and
the Internet - such as the actions that were taken by Verisign and other
registries in coordination with ICANN in order to mitigate the threat from the
Conficker virus.
One other significant change to the agreement would give the registry operator
more flexibility to offer training, technical support, marketing or incentive
programs for the purpose of supporting the development of the Internet in
underserved markets.
The appendices to the agreement are also generally consistent with the current
agreement. There are limited updates and deletion of obsolete provisions to
Appendices 4, 7 and 10 - readily apparent in the redline document. These
updates reflect changes to technical protocols and refinement of reporting
requirements.
The following documents are provided for public comment:
* Proposed Renewal Agreement [PDF, 388 KB]
* Redline showing changes from the current .NET agreement [PDF, 200 KB]
* Proposed Renewal Agreement Appendices [PDF, 892 KB]
* Redline showing changes from the current .NET appendices [PDF, 608 KB]
* Summary and explanation of changes [PDF, 356 KB]
Public comment may be submitted to net-agreement-renewal@xxxxxxxxx through 10
May 2011 and viewed at http://forum.icann.org/lists/net-agreement-renewal/.
Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat
gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://gnso.icann.org
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|