<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] Motion to accept the SOI revisions
- To: Adrian Kinderis <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [council] Motion to accept the SOI revisions
- From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 12:24:35 +0200
- Cc: GNSO Council <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <8CEF048B9EC83748B1517DC64EA130FB4B34F59E8F@off-win2003-01.ausregistrygroup.local>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <4D5EAAFF-C6A2-4D38-919C-2CB38A0670E1@indom.com> <8CEF048B9EC83748B1517DC64EA130FB4B34F59E8F@off-win2003-01.ausregistrygroup.local>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thanks Adrian.
Stéphane
Le 28 mars 2011 à 12:08, Adrian Kinderis a écrit :
> I second.
>
> Adrian Kinderis
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder
> Sent: Monday, 28 March 2011 8:41 PM
> To: GNSO Council
> Subject: [council] Motion to accept the SOI revisions
>
> Councillors,
>
> I would like to make the following motion to accept the SOI language
> revisions we worked on a while back, and have them incorporated into the
> GNSO's Ops Procs. These have been put out for public comment and no comments
> have been received.
>
> A second would be appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Stéphane
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|