Re: [council] Tomorrow's Public Council Meeting Agenda Prioritisation

[Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx]

I must confess it's partly "my bad" - in helping to work on the final
agenda yesterday I'd switched up the RAP issue and had meant to do the
same with the RAA motion, but for some reason didn't do both (ironic, I
know, given that I had proposed the RAA motion!)

 
Mary W S Wong
Professor of Law
Chair, Graduate IP Programs
Director, Franklin Pierce Center for IP
UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAWTwo White StreetConcord, NH
03301USAEmail: mary.wong@xxxxxxx.eduPhone: 1-603-513-5143Webpage:
http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.phpSelected writings available on
the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at:
http://ssrn.com/author=437584>>> 


From: William Drake <william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To:"Rosette, Kristina" <krosette@xxxxxxx>
CC:'Stéphane Van Gelder'<stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>, Zahid Jamil
<zahid@xxxxxxxxx>, "'GNSO Council'" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 3/16/2011 2:46 PM
Subject: Re: [council] Tomorrow's Public Council Meeting Agenda
Prioritisation

Given the time crunch and the possibility that things could get pressed
at the back end, front loading the motions seems sensible to me too. 
Just switch items 4 and 8 and we're there…

Bill

On Mar 16, 2011, at 11:34 AM, Rosette, Kristina wrote:

> 
> I support Zahid's request and request that you reconsider, Stephane.
Leaving at the end of the agenda the two motions that the CPH is certain
to oppose lends itself to optics issues that I'd prefer we avoid. 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder
> Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 9:29 PM
> To: Zahid Jamil
> Cc: 'GNSO Council'
> Subject: Re: [council] Tomorrow's Public Council Meeting Agenda
Prioritisation
> 
> 
> Thanks Zahid.
> 
> Setting up the agenda and the logistics around this meeting has taken
up a lot of our time and energy due to the scheduling complications
involved.
> 
> At this stage, I would therefore not give anybody more work
(including myself), by making any last-minute changes unless they are
absolutely necessary.
> 
> Thanks for your understanding.
> 
> Stéphane
> 
> 
> 
> Le 16 mars 2011 à 02:20, Zahid Jamil a écrit :
> 
>> 
>> 
>> Would it be possible to have those Agenda items that involve Motions

>> to be passed to be taken up as a priority ie. for them to be dealt 
>> with earlier in the meeting.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Zahid Jamil
>> 
>> Barrister-at-law
>> 
>> Jamil & Jamil
>> 
>> Barristers-at-law
>> 
>> 219-221 Central Hotel Annexe
>> 
>> Merewether Road, Karachi. Pakistan
>> 
>> Cell: +923008238230
>> 
>> Tel: +92 21 35680760 / 35685276 / 35655025
>> 
>> Fax: +92 21 35655026
>> 
>> www.jamilandjamil.com <http://www.jamilandjamil.com/>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Notice / Disclaimer
>> 
>> This message contains confidential information and its contents are

>> being communicated only for the intended recipients . If you are not

>> the intended recipient you should not disseminate, distribute or
copy this e-mail.
>> Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received

>> this message by mistake and delete it from your system. The contents

>> above may contain/are the intellectual property of Jamil & Jamil, 
>> Barristers-at-Law, and constitute privileged information protected
by 
>> attorney client privilege. The reproduction, publication, use, 
>> amendment, modification of any kind whatsoever of any part or parts

>> (including photocopying or storing it in any medium by electronic 
>> means whether or not transiently or incidentally or some other use
of 
>> this communication) without prior written permission and consent of
Jamil & Jamil is prohibited.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> <winmail.dat>
> 
> 
>