<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] Current draft
- To: tim@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [council] Current draft
- From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 20:00:53 +0100
- Cc: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <1674369518-1300121097-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-807274736-@bda959.bisx.prod.on.blackberry>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <4D7CFABD0200005B00069DD2@mail.law.unh.edu><D190C149-85AE-40E0-BF2D-950CE692202B@indom.com> <1674369518-1300121097-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-807274736-@bda959.bisx.prod.on.blackberry>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thanks Tim.
Stéphane
Le 14 mars 2011 à 17:44, tim@xxxxxxxxxxx a écrit :
> I'm good with it.
> From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 17:35:19 +0100
> To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx GNSO<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Fwd: [council] Current draft
>
> Councillors,
>
> As these group comments will have to be read out this afternoon, at the start
> of the sessions, we need to move forwards on finalising the Council comment
> asap.
>
> Does the proposed text below suit everyone? If not, please provide proposed
> edits by this lunch time. I would like to have final approval on a text from
> the Council by the time we meet with the ccNSO at lunchtime. This will help
> give enough time to forward the text to the Board and the GAC before I read
> it out to them this afternoon. I am sure that is a courtesy they would
> appreciate.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Stéphane
>
>
>
> Début du message réexpédié :
>
>> De : Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> Date : 13 mars 2011 22:11:25 HNEC
>> À : "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Stéphane Van
>> Gelder" <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Objet : Rép : [council] Current draft
>>
>> Will something like this work?
>>
>> "The GNSO would like to thank the Board and the GAC for the hard work that
>> has been done during the recent and ongoing consultations. The GNSO
>> appreciates these efforts to bring to a close the implementation of the
>> Policy Development Process that it approved by supermajority vote in 2007.
>>
>> The GNSO is ready to help the Board and the GAC complete work on the issues
>> that are currently before them and to provide any detail or context that may
>> be needed during those discussions.
>>
>> We wish to emphasize the importance of the bottom-up multi-stakeholder
>> approach and request that in formulating any further changes to and new
>> elements for the final version of the Applicant Guidebook, the Board fully
>> consider the input provided by the GNSO.
>>
>> We also ask that any resulting modifications to the Applicant Guidebook be
>> carried out in a timely manner and the final version of that Guidebook be
>> published as soon as possible."
>>
>> Cheers
>> Mary
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Mary W S Wong
>> Professor of Law
>> Chair, Graduate IP Programs
>> UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAW
>> Two White Street
>> Concord, NH 03301
>> USA
>> Email: mary.wong@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> Phone: 1-603-513-5143
>> Webpage: http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.php
>> Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN)
>> at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584
>> >>>
>> From: Stéphane Van Gelder<stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
>> To: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: 3/13/2011 4:50 PM
>> Subject: [council] Current draft
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|