<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] questions for our joint meetings with GAC and ccNSO
what TLD you are talking about? lets be more specific.
---andrei
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2011 3:00 AM
To: Stéphane_Van_Gelder
Cc: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx GNSO
Subject: RE: [council] questions for our joint meetings with GAC and ccNSO
One thing I have long wondered is why a ccTLD that is redelegated to commercial
purpose is still managed under cover of ccTLD rules. I suspect there is an
onion-like history to the matter, but I wonder if the number of such switches
is going to accelerate. I have to imagine the public discussion over new gTLDs
is giving a lot of CCTLD registries encouragement to draft the market motion.
I guess my question is: Is it likely the move from cc to more general purpose
will accelerate?
Cheers,
Berard
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [council] questions for our joint meetings with GAC and ccNSO
From: Stéphane_Van_Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx
<http://stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx%3e> >;
Date: Sat, March 12, 2011 2:47 pm
To: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Here are the questions I wrote down during our meeting today. These were done
on the fly some will obviously need some work. Please correct/amend/refine as
necessary. There is some urgency for the GAC questions as that is tomorrow and
it would be good if we could some questions to the GAC asap.
Thanks,
Stéphane
For the ccNSO
- A short explanation of how the 2 Councils work.
- What are the ccNSO currently working on?
- Does the ccNSO see value in meeting with the GNSO Council and if so, how can
we maximise that value?
- There are big changes to the current ICANN landscape coming, with respect to
new gTLDs, what would the ccNSO's position be on cc operators that plan to run
gTLDs?
- How to deal with CWGs and should the recommendations
For the GAC
- Do we want to have a formal group formed between GAC and GNSO to discuss and
- Should we work on finding a new liaison from the GAC to the GNSO ?
- CWGs, what is the GAC's view on these and how should their recommendations be
processed?
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|