<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] A WhoIs motion for our meeting in San Francisco
Thanks for making this motion John, it will be included in our agenda for next
Wednesday.
Stéphane
Le 8 mars 2011 à 02:36, <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a
écrit :
> As the new guy, I am willing to tilt at windmills and so want to offer this
> motion for consideration at the next meeting of the GNSO Council
>
> Cheers,
>
> John Berard
>
> Whereas:
>
> In October 2007, the GNSO Council concluded that a comprehensive and
> objective understanding of key factual issues regarding the gTLD WHOIS system
> would benefit future GNSO policy development efforts
> (http://gnso.icann.org/resolutions/).
>
> Before defining study details, the Council solicited suggestions from the
> community for specific topics of study on WHOIS. Suggestions were submitted
> (http://forum.icann.org/lists/WHOIS-comments-2008/) and ICANN staff prepared
> a 'Report on Public Suggestions on Further Studies of WHOIS', dated
> 25-Feb-2008
> (http://gnso.icann.org/issues/Whois-privacy/Whois-study-suggestion-report-25feb08.pdf).
>
> On 28-Mar-2008 the GNSO Council resolved to form a WHOIS Study Working Group
> to develop a proposed list, ifany, of recommended studies for which ICANN
> staff would be asked to providecost estimates to the Council
> (http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/minutes-gnso-27mar08.shtml).
>
> The WHOIS Study WG did not reach consensus regarding further studies, and on
> 25-Jun-2008 the GNSO Council resolved to form a new WHOIS Hypotheses working
> group to prepare a list of hypotheses from the 'Report on Public Suggestions
> on Further Studies of WHOIS' and the GAC letter on WHOIS studies
> (http://www.icann.org/correspondence/karlins-to-thrush-16apr08.pdf). The WG
> reported to the Council on 26-Aug-2008.
> (https://st.icann.org/Whois-hypoth-wg/index.cgi?Whois_hypotheses_wg#Whois_study_hypotheses_wg_final_report).
>
> On 5-Nov-2008, the Council convened a group of Councilors and constituency
> members to draft a resolution regarding studies, if any, for which cost
> estimates should be obtained. TheWhois Study Drafting Team further
> consolidated studies including those from the GAC
> (http://www.icann.org/correspondence/karlins-to-thrush-16apr08.pdf). The
> Team determined that the six studies with the highest average priority scores
> should be the subject of further research to determine feasibility and obtain
> cost estimates.
>
> On 04-Mar-2009, Council requested Staff to conduct research on feasibility
> and cost estimates for selected Whois studies and report its findings to
> Council. (See Motion 3, http://gnso.icann.org/resolutions/#200903).
>
> On 23-Mar-2010, Staff presented a report on the feasibility and cost
> estimates for the Whois “Misuse” and Whois “Registrant Identification”
> Studies, finding that each study would cost approximately $150,000 and take
> approximately one year to complete.
> (http://gnso.icann.org/issues/whois/whois-studies-report-for-gnso-23mar10-en.pdf).
> The Whois Registrant Identification study would gather info about how
> business/commercial domain registrants are identified, and correlate such
> identification with the use of proxy/privacyservices.
>
> The ICANN Board approved in Brussels a FY2011 budget that includes at least
> $400,000 for WHOIS studies (see
> http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/resolutions-25jun10-en.htm#8).
>
> On 8-September-2010 the GNSO Council approved a resolution requesting staff
> to proceed with the Whois “Misuse” Study, which would explore the extent to
> which publicly displayed WHOIS data is misused,
> http://gnso.icann.org/resolutions/#201009.
>
> On 5-October-2010, staff provided feasibility and cost analysis for a Whois
> Privacy and Proxy “Abuse” study,
> http://gnso.icann.org/issues/whois/gnso-whois-pp-abuse-studies-report-05oct10-en.pdf.
> This study would compare broad sample of domains registered with a proxy
> orprivacy service provider that are associated with alleged harmful acts
> withoverall frequency of proxy and privacy registrations. This study was
> estimated to cost $150,000 and take less than a year to complete.
>
> On 11-February-2011, staff provided a feasibility and cost analysis for a
> Whois Proxy and Privacy “Relay and Reveal” study,
> http://gnso.icann.org/issues/whois/whois-pp-relay-reveal-studies-report-11feb11-en.pdf,
> which would analyze relay and reveal requests sent for Privacy and
> Proxy-registered domains to explore and document how they are processed. The
> staff analysis concluded that it was premature to conduct a full study, and
> recommended that a pre-study “survey” be conducted first, to determine if
> launching a full study is feasible to do.
>
> Resolved:
>
> Council requests ICANN staff to proceed with the WHOIS Registrant
> Identification Study, as described in Staff's 23-Mar-2010 Report, using the
> vendor selection process described in Annex of that same report.
> (http://gnso.icann.org/issues/whois/whois-studies-report-for-gnso-23mar10-en.pdf).
>
> Further resolved, that the Council requests ICANN staff to proceed with the
> Whois Privacy and Proxy “Abuse” study, as described in staff’s 5-October-2010
> report, using the vendor selection process described in that same report,
> http://gnso.icann.org/issues/whois/gnso-whois-pp-abuse-studies-report-05oct10-en.pdf.
>
> Further resolved, that the Council requests ICANN staff to proceed with the
> Whois Privacy and Proxy “Relay and Reveal” pre-study survey, as proposed in
> staff’s 11-February-2011 report,
> http://gnso.icann.org/issues/whois/whois-pp-relay-reveal-studies-report-11feb11-en.pdf.
>
> Further resolved, that the Council request that the Board authorize
> additional funding for FY 2012 forWhois studies, to make up the shortfall of
> $130,000 between the amount of “at least $400,000” that was allocated for
> Whois studies in FY 2011 (and remains unspent), and the total amount needed
> to conduct the Whois Misuse Study ($150,000); the Whois Registrant
> Identification Study ($150,000); the Proxy/Privacy “Abuse” Study ($150,000);
> and the Proxy and Privacy “Pre-study” ($80,000), total of $530,000.
>
> Further resolved, in recognition that there is a substantial amount of
> coordination needed to direct this research, that staff be given the
> discretion to manage the studies serially or in parallel, with a goal of
> expediting completion of the studies as efficiently as possible.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|