ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] GNSO SF schedule

  • To: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [council] GNSO SF schedule
  • From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 00:38:51 +0100
  • Cc: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>, Olga Cavalli <olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx>, GNSO Council <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • In-reply-to: <C98941FF.E6B0%julie.hedlund@icann.org>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <C98941FF.E6B0%julie.hedlund@icann.org>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Thanks Julie,

I think it's fine if the Council meets with Patrik, although I am not sure the 
Council requested that meeting specifically.

However if Patrik wants to meet with the Council, we should accommodate that 
but it would be useful to have an agenda for that meeting.



Le 22 févr. 2011 à 16:35, Julie Hedlund a écrit :

> Jeff,
> With respect to the SSAC meeting, it was my understanding that the GNSO 
> Council wanted to meet with Patrik Faltstrom.  As to an agenda, he plans to 
> provide a brief presentation on current SSAC activities followed by questions 
> and discussion with the Councilors.  I do know that he would very much like 
> to meet with the GNSO Council, but when and whether that happens is, of 
> course, up to the Council.  He is very interested in encouraging dialog 
> between the SSAC and the SOs and other ACs.   If the Council does not wish to 
> meet with him I will need to know as soon as possible since I am managing 
> Patrik’s schedule.  
> Thanks,
> Julie
> On 2/22/11 10:23 AM, "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Olga,
>> Can we get an explanation of what the purpose of the 9-10 meeting with 
>> Patrick and the SSAC is for?  Is there an agenda?  I know many of the 
>> stakeholder groups are meeting with them separately, so I am not sure why we 
>> need to meet with them at a Council level as well.
>> Also, I am not sure why there are two conflicting meetings from 10:30-12 on 
>> Saturday (PPSC and RAP).   There is no RAP working group anymore, so any 
>> discussions on the resolutions passed by Council at the meeting earlier this 
>> month need to be had as a full Council.   My recommendation would be that we 
>> move the discussions on the Registration Abuse to 9-10 and if we need to 
>> have a conflicting meeting, we can have Councilors on the PPSC choose 
>> between meeting with the SSAC and the PPSC meeting.  
>> Can we also change the Sunday meeting entitled “PPSC” to “PDP-WT”?
>> Thanks.
>> Jeffrey J. Neuman 
>> Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy
>> The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the 
>> use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or 
>> privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have 
>> received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, 
>> distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have 
>> received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and 
>> delete the original message.
>> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
>> Behalf Of Olga Cavalli
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2011 6:48 AM
>> To: GNSO Council
>> Subject: [council] GNSO SF schedule
>> Hi,
>> attached you can find a new version of the GNSO SF Schedule.
>> Please note that Saturday 9-10 am there will be a presentation by Patrick 
>> Falstrom new chair of the SSAC.
>> There are still some meetings to be confirmed / defined. (marked yellow)
>> Please let Glen and myself know if all events and changes have been 
>> reflected in this new version or if you have any suggestion or comment.
>> Best regards
>> Olga

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>