RE: [council] CORRECTION: Proposed Friendly Amendment to Zahid's Amendment to RAP motion

["Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I don't recall that being in our operating procedures, or that we have
ever operated that way even informally.

In any event, if it should be determined that the motion stands then I
make a friendly amendment to it: remove resolve #2 requesting an issues
report on the UDRP. I accept that as friendly, and it is my
understanding then if the seconder of my motion does not accept it as
friendly it will only need another Councilor to second it.

Thanks,
Tim 
 
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [council] CORRECTION: Proposed Friendly Amendment to Zahid's
Amendment to RAP motion
From: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, February 02, 2011 8:14 pm
To: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>, "'GNSO Council'"
<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

All,
 
It is my understanding that despite the original author of a motion
wanting the withdraw, the motion may indeed still be on the table if 2
Councilors support the motion staying on the table.  I cannot say
whether that will happen, but in the event it does (or if it comes up
later), I have to correct the Friendly Amendment proposed by the
Registries.  It should read:
 
·         Creating anti-abuse terms of service for possible inclusion
in Registrar-Registrant agreements by registrars who adopt them, and for
use by TLD operators who adopt them.
 
 
So the full amendment would read:
RESOLVED #3, the GNSO Council requests an Issue Report on the creation
of non-binding best practices to help registrars and registries address
the illicit use of domain names in accordance with Registration Abuse
Policies Working Group Final Report.
This effort should consider (but not be limited the following subjects:
• Practices for identifying stolen credentials
• Practices for identifying and investigating common forms of
malicious use (such as malware and phishing)
• Creating anti-abuse terms of service for possible inclusion in
Registrar-Registrant agreements by registrars who adopt them, and for
use by TLD operators who adopt them. 
• Identifying compromised/hacked domains versus domain registered by
abusers
• Practices for suspending domain names
• Account access security management
• Security resources of use or interest to registrars and registries
• Survey registrars and registries to determine practices being used,
and their adoption rates.
 
I hope this is still treated as friendly.
 
 
Jeffrey J. Neuman 
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy







The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for
the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential
and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you
have received this e-mail message in error and any review,
dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately and delete the original message.
 

 
From: Neuman, Jeff 
Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2011 3:14 PM
To: 'GNSO Council'
Subject: Proposed Friendly Amendment to Zahid's Amendment to RAP motion


 
All,

The RySG is proposing a friendly amendment to Zahid’s proposed
amendment to the RAP Motion.  We understand Zahid’s motion is not
considered friendly by Tim, so there will be a vote on Zahid’s
proposal.   As discussed on an RySG call this morning, the RySG will
support Zahid’s proposed amendment if his motion is amended by adding
the word “possible” in the sentence:
 
·         Creating anti-abuse terms of service for possible inclusion
in Registrar-Registrant agreements, and for use by TLD operators.
 
 
So the full amendment would read:
RESOLVED #3, the GNSO Council requests an Issue Report on the creation
of non-binding best practices to help registrars and registries address
the illicit use of domain names in accordance with Registration Abuse
Policies Working Group Final Report.
This effort should consider (but not be limited the following subjects:
• Practices for identifying stolen credentials
• Practices for identifying and investigating common forms of
malicious use (such as malware and phishing)
• Creating anti-abuse terms of service for possible inclusion in
Registrar-Registrant agreements, and for use by TLD operators.
• Identifying compromised/hacked domains versus domain registered by
abusers
• Practices for suspending domain names
• Account access security management
• Security resources of use or interest to registrars and registries
• Survey registrars and registries to determine practices being used,
and their adoption rates.
 
 
 
The rationale is that the premise of the work is for the creation of
non-binding best practices and adding this word is in line with that
notion.  We hope this will be considered friendly.

Thanks.
 
 
Jeffrey J. Neuman 
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy
46000 Center Oak Plaza Sterling, VA 20166
Office: +1.571.434.5772  Mobile: +1.202.549.5079  Fax: +1.703.738.7965 /
jeff.neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx  / www.neustar.biz      






The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for
the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential
and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you
have received this e-mail message in error and any review,
dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately and delete the original message.