RE: [council] 3rd Feb Council Call RAP Motion Amendment

["Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Mary,
I believe the Working Group recommended that even though this would not be a 
“PDP”, it should follow the PDP processes.

Stephane – I am reviewing this motion with my stakeholder group and will 
hopefully be able to respond to your question after that.  Unfortunately our SG 
meeting is not until the day before the meeting, so it may not be until then 
that I have a definitive answer.

Thanks.

Jeffrey J. Neuman
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy

________________________________
The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use 
of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged 
information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this 
e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying 
of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication 
in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message.


From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Mary Wong
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 7:15 AM
To: Zahid Jamil; Stéphane Van Gelder
Cc: 'GNSO Council'
Subject: Re: [council] 3rd Feb Council Call RAP Motion Amendment

Hi - I had a couple of questions for Zahid and the BC - unfortunately I haven't 
had the chance to go back to the RAP WG final report, or refer to the RAP 
Implementation DT's letter and rankings/recommendations but here goes. First, 
how does the list of topics relate to both group's consensus recommendations, 
and, secondly, do these need an Issues Report (which usually prefaces a vote 
for/against a full PDP)?

Thanks
Mary

Mary W S Wong
Professor of Law
Chair, Graduate IP Programs
UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAW
Two White Street
Concord, NH 03301
USA
Email: mary.wong@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:mary.wong@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Phone: 1-603-513-5143
Webpage: http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.php
Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at: 
http://ssrn.com/author=437584
>>>
From:

Stéphane Van Gelder<stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>

To:

Zahid Jamil <zahid@xxxxxxxxx>

CC:

"'GNSO Council'" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date:

1/27/2011 5:59 AM

Subject:

Re: [council] 3rd Feb Council Call RAP Motion Amendment

Thanks Zahid.

Tim, Jeff, do you accept the amendment as friendly?

Stéphane
Le 26 janv. 2011 à 19:22, Zahid Jamil a écrit :


Dear All,
On behalf of the BC I would like to propose the following amendment to the 
Council motion at item 6 (RAP).  In the motion (deferred from the previous 
Council call -https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?3_february_motions) 
the following may be added as Resolved 3:
RESOLVED #3, the GNSO Council requests an Issue Report on the creation of 
non-binding best practices to help registrars and registries address the 
illicit use of domain names in accordance with Registration Abuse Policies 
Working Group Final Report. This effort should consider (but not be limited the 
following subjects:

 *   Practices for identifying stolen credentials
 *   Practices for identifying and investigating common forms of malicious use 
(such as malware and phishing)
 *   Creating anti-abuse terms of service for inclusion in Registrar-Registrant 
agreements, and for use by TLD operators.
 *   Identifying compromised/hacked domains versus domain registered by abusers
 *   Practices for suspending domain names
 *   Account access security management
 *   Security resources of use or interest to registrars and registries
 *   Survey registrars and registries to determine practices being used, and 
their adoption rates.
Sincerely,
Zahid Jamil
Barrister-at-law
Jamil & Jamil
Barristers-at-law
219-221 Central Hotel Annexe
Merewether Road, Karachi. Pakistan
Cell: +923008238230
Tel: +92 21 35680760 / 35685276 / 35655025
Fax: +92 21 35655026
www.jamilandjamil.com<http://www.jamilandjamil.com/>
Notice / Disclaimer
This message contains confidential information and its contents are being 
communicated only for the intended recipients . If you are not the intended 
recipient you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.  Please 
notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this message by 
mistake and delete it from your system. The contents above may contain/are the 
intellectual property of DNDRC, and constitute privileged information protected 
by attorney client privilege. The reproduction, publication, use, amendment, 
modification of any kind whatsoever of any part or parts (including 
photocopying or storing it in any medium by electronic means whether or not 
transiently or incidentally or some other use of this communication) without 
prior written permission and consent of DNDRC is prohibited.





As of August 30, 2010, Franklin Pierce Law Center has affiliated with the 
University of New Hampshire and is now known as the University of New Hampshire 
School of Law. Please note that all email addresses have changed and now follow 
the convention: firstname.lastname@xxxxxxxxxxx. For more information on the 
University of New Hampshire School of Law, please visit 
law.unh.edu<http://law.unh.edu>