<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] SO and AC Chairs meeting with Rod before SF
Thanks Tim, Wendy, Jeff for your comments.
Just a few clarifications.
This is being proposed by Rod. It is not the Chairs proposing.
I'm sure there will be extra costs involved. Two extra days are bound to cost
something.
Also, I think it is unrealistic to imagine that the Chairs would be there
solely in their own capacity. They are being invited as Chairs of their
respective SOs and ACs in the first place, after all. But I agree they
certainly should not be carrying any group message when they go.
Plus we should bear in mind that this meeting will probably happen even if the
GNSO is against it. So do we want to be the only ones not going?
Anyway, I am glad this discussion is starting. I hope Staff can address the
valid points you are all making. In the meantime, the message I am getting is
that the Council does not want me to take part.
Stéphane
Le 19 janv. 2011 à 17:49, Tim Ruiz a écrit :
> Two days for an informal meet and greet? There must be some other
> agenda. And what does negligible mean?
>
> IMHO, if the Chairs want to make a date and show up early to chat, etc.
> that's fine with me as long as 1) there is no additional cost to ICANN,
> meaning ZERO, and 2) it is understood that they are there in their own
> capacity and not acting on behalf of their SO/AC.
>
>
> Tim
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [council] SO and AC Chairs meeting with Rod before SF
> From: Stéphane_Van_Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, January 19, 2011 9:50 am
> To: GNSO Council <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> Councillors,
>
> FYI, Rod is inviting the SO and AC Chairs to a 2-day meeting prior to
> the ICANN SF meeting. The idea is to have informal discussions and to
> help the SO and AC Chairs get to know each other better.
>
> I have not agreed to going yet, but have asked what the cost of the
> meeting would be, which part of the ICANN meeting this would come from,
> whether the meeting would be official?
>
> I am told the additional costs would be negligible and part of the ICANN
> meeting budget.
>
> If anyone is opposed to me going, please say so.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Stéphane
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|