<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] Council/Chair interaction
- To: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [council] Council/Chair interaction
- From: Adrian Kinderis <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 21:26:41 +1100
- Accept-language: en-US, en-AU
- Acceptlanguage: en-US, en-AU
- Cc: GNSO Council <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <731C64C1-85CA-4396-8BB3-D4B7EED682DC@indom.com>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <731C64C1-85CA-4396-8BB3-D4B7EED682DC@indom.com>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: Acu3wzlXUM2Fn6ZESMa9Co8SJcqSXA==
- Thread-topic: [council] Council/Chair interaction
What was the reasoning for this? Where did this idea come from?
I am not sure why they need the input or direct engagement.
Will this be a public list? If not why not?
I think it is the role of each councillor to liaise with their SG.
We are forever widening the Council. More opinions. More inefficient debate.
I don't agree with this.
Adrian Kinderis
...court side at the Australian Open tennis!
Sent from my iPad
On 19/01/2011, at 3:45, "Stéphane Van Gelder" <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>
> Councillors,
>
> I wanted to inform you that I have suggested to your group Chairs that a
> mailing list be created to link the C and SG leadership with the Council
> leadership.
>
> Their response was very much in favour, so a mailing list will be set up for
> the Council leaders (Chair and VC) and the group leaders (Chair and VC).
>
> The idea is to improve informal communications between the group leadership
> and the Council.
>
> We are also thinking about a regular conf call at some point, but this is not
> set in stone yet.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Stéphane
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|