ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] Council/Chair interaction

  • To: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [council] Council/Chair interaction
  • From: Adrian Kinderis <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 21:26:41 +1100
  • Accept-language: en-US, en-AU
  • Acceptlanguage: en-US, en-AU
  • Cc: GNSO Council <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • In-reply-to: <731C64C1-85CA-4396-8BB3-D4B7EED682DC@indom.com>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <731C64C1-85CA-4396-8BB3-D4B7EED682DC@indom.com>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: Acu3wzlXUM2Fn6ZESMa9Co8SJcqSXA==
  • Thread-topic: [council] Council/Chair interaction

What was the reasoning for this? Where did this idea come from?

I am not sure why they need the input or direct engagement.

Will this be a public list? If not why not?

I think it is the role of each councillor to liaise with their SG.

We are forever widening the Council. More opinions. More inefficient debate.

I don't agree with this.

Adrian Kinderis
...court side at the Australian Open tennis!

Sent from my iPad

On 19/01/2011, at 3:45, "Stéphane Van Gelder" <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx> 

> Councillors,
> I wanted to inform you that I have suggested to your group Chairs that a 
> mailing list be created to link the C and SG leadership with the Council 
> leadership.
> Their response was very much in favour, so a mailing list will be set up for 
> the Council leaders (Chair and VC) and the group leaders (Chair and VC).
> The idea is to improve informal communications between the group leadership 
> and the Council.
> We are also thinking about a regular conf call at some point, but this is not 
> set in stone yet.
> Thanks,
> Stéphane

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>