<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] Re: NCSG comments to the GNSO Council on the CWG Rec 6 Recommendations.
- To: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] Re: NCSG comments to the GNSO Council on the CWG Rec 6 Recommendations.
- From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 10:46:52 +0100
- Cc: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Council" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <1D78E3E2-47BB-45EC-84A7-488A804DA388@acm.org>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <1D78E3E2-47BB-45EC-84A7-488A804DA388@acm.org>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thank you Avri for submitting these comments.
Stéphane
Le 12 janv. 2011 à 21:59, Avri Doria a écrit :
>
> To the GNSO Council;
>
> Enclosed are the comments from the NCSG . As stated in the comments:
>
> The NCSG strongly recommends that the GNSO Council endorse those
> recommendations made by the CWG that constituted Full Consensus and
> Consensus in the CWG, and consider as soon as possible a GNSO position
> on those recommendations that were the subject of Strong Support within
> the CWG.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Avri Doria
> Chair, NCSG Executive Committee
>
>
> <NCSG Comments To The GNSO Council On The CWG Rec 6 Recommendations.pdf>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|