<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] Future GNSO Activity? Re - .job Reconsideration Request
Thanks for volunteering to help Debbie.
Stéphane
Le 13 déc. 2010 à 14:56, <HughesDeb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
> Rosemary,
> I can assist.
> Debbie
>
> Debra Y. Hughes l Senior Counsel
> American Red Cross
>
> Office of the General Counsel
> 2025 E Street, NW
> Washington, D.C. 20006
> Phone: (202) 303-5356
> Fax: (202) 303-0143
> HughesDeb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder
> Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2010 2:22 PM
> To: rosemary.sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: GNSO Council
> Subject: Re: [council] Future GNSO Activity? Re - .job Reconsideration Request
>
> Hi Rosemary,
>
> Thanks for offering to take the lead on this. I think that would be most
> helpful.
>
> Would anyone else like to volunteer to work with Rosemary on this?
>
> Stéphane
>
> Le 12 déc. 2010 à 17:59, rosemary.sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxx a écrit :
>
>
> Hi Stephane
>
> I hosted a workshop in Catragena on Consumer Choice and Trust as per AoC
>
> This topic came up as one of our discussion points
>
> I'd be happy to take responsibilty for progressing this work in GNSO and with
> the other groups if that would be of assistance
>
> Cheers
>
> Rosemary
> Sent from my BlackBerry® from Optus
>
> From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sender: <owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 03:45:51 +1100
> To: Neuman, Jeff<Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: 'GNSO Council'<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [council] Future GNSO Activity? Re - .job Reconsideration Request
>
> Thanks Jeff.
>
> I am working on the agenda for our next Council meeting and the two Cartagena
> Board resolutions that referenced the GNSO will be included in that agenda as
> discussion items.
>
> There's res8, as you mention, and res6, where the Board is asking that
> Resolved (2010.12.10.30), the ICANN Board requests advice from the ALAC, GAC,
> GNSO and ccNSO on establishing the definition, measures, and three year
> targets for those measures, for competition, consumer trust and consumer
> choice in the context of the domain name system, such advice to be provided
> for discussion at the ICANN International Public meeting in San Francisco
> from 13-18 March 2010.
>
> There's actually very little time for us to start working on this and be
> ready by SF.
>
> As people wind down from the Cartagena meeting, it's possibly not the best
> time to start looking at these two action items right now. But I will be
> asking the Council to do so in the upcoming weeks and, as mentioned, I would
> then like us to discuss during our Jan 13 meeting.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Stéphane
>
>
>
> Le 12 déc. 2010 à 16:12, Neuman, Jeff a écrit :
>
>
> FYI, saw this resolution passed on the reconsideration request for a registry
> service by .jobs. Although the reconsideration request was denied, there is
> a reference in the BGC recommendation that asks the GNSO to consider a
> process to evaluate amendments that may have the effect of changing, or
> seeking to change, an sTLD Charter or stated purpose of a sponsored,
> restricted or community-based TLD.
>
> The BGC report can be found at:
> http://www.icann.org/en/committees/reconsideration/bgc-recommendation-09dec10-en.pdf.
> The Resolution is below:
>
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1. Response to Reconsideration Request 10-2
>
> Whereas, the BGC has reviewed and considered Reconsideration Request 10-2
> submitted by the .JOBS Charter Compliance Coalition on 20 August 2010
> (supplemented as posted at
> <http://www.icann.org/en/committees/board-governance/requests-for-reconsideration-en.htm>)
> concerning the Board's 5 August 2010 resolution approving Employ Media’s
> .JOBS Phased Allocation Program.
>
> Whereas, the BGC recommended that the Request be denied as unsupported
> because: (i) the Coalition’s concerns regarding potential violations of the
> Charter in the implementation of the Phased Allocation Program is not a
> proper ground for reconsidering the Board’s 5 August 2010 Action; and (ii)
> the Board did not fail to consider material information available at the time
> of the Action.
>
> Whereas, the BGC recommended that the Board direct the President and CEO, and
> General Counsel and Secretary, to ensure that ICANN’s Contractual Compliance
> Department closely monitor Employ Media’s compliance with its Charter.
>
> Whereas, the BGC recommended that the Board direct the CEO to create a
> briefing paper for the GNSO to consider on this matter, and for the GNSO to
> determine whether a policy development process should be commenced.
>
> Whereas, the Reconsideration Request and the BGC's Recommendation has been
> posted on the ICANN website
> <http://www.icann.org/en/committees/board-governance/requests-for-reconsideration-en.htm>.
>
> Resolved (2010.12.10.35), the Board adopts the Recommendation of the BGC on
> Reconsideration Request 10-2.
>
>
>
> Jeffrey J. Neuman
> Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy
> 46000 Center Oak Plaza Sterling, VA 20166
> Office: +1.571.434.5772 Mobile: +1.202.549.5079 Fax: +1.703.738.7965 /
> jeff.neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx / www.neustar.biz
> The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use
> of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or
> privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have
> received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination,
> distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete
> the original message.
>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|