<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] Rec 6 motion: possible amendment
- To: <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] Rec 6 motion: possible amendment
- From: "Mary Wong" <Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 16:16:19 -0500
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hello again,
So as not to overly belabor the point or cause your Inboxes to overflow, would
reformulating the motion along the following lines render it acceptable to
those who were inclined to vote against it? Basically I added a Whereas clause
and rewrote the problematic "endorsed" clause in the Resolved section:
"WHEREAS, on 8 September 2010 the GNSO Council endorsed GNSO participation in a
joint working group with other interested Supporting Organizations (SOs) and
Advisory Committee (ACs) to provide guidance to the ICANN new gTLD
Implementation Team and the ICANN Board in relation to the implementation of
the Council's Recommendation 6 regarding strings that contravene
generally-accepted legal norms relating to morality and public order that are
recognized under international principles of law;
WHEREAS, the Recommendation 6 cross-community working group (CWG) was
established in accordance with the Terms of Reference also approved by the GNSO
Council on 8 September 2010;
WHEREAS, the CWG has since delivered a set of recommendations regarding
implementation of the GNSO Council's Recommendation 6 for new gTLDs to the
community;
AND WHEREAS, the role of the Council is to manage the cross-community process
on behalf of the GNSO community and the Council notes that the CWG's
implementation proposals have been produced in accordance with the group's
Terms of Reference;
RESOLVED, the Council thanks the CWG and its participants, from the GNSO and
other SOs and the ACs, for their hard work; and acknowledges that the CWG
recommendations do not constitute Consensus Policy or GNSO policy development
otherwise within the purview of the GNSO;
RESOLVED FURTHER, the Council recommends that each Stakeholder Group provide
feedback as soon as possible to the CWG, in order to resolve outstanding
questions regarding implementation of Recommendation 6 in a judicious manner,
considering in particular those recommendations that received Full Consensus in
the CWG.
Thanks,
Mary
Mary W S Wong
Professor of Law
Chair, Graduate IP Programs
UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAWTwo White StreetConcord, NH
03301USAEmail: mary.wong@xxxxxxx.eduPhone: 1-603-513-5143Webpage:
http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.phpSelected writings available on the
Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584
As of August 30, 2010, Franklin Pierce Law Center has affiliated with the
University of New Hampshire and is now known as the University of New Hampshire
School of Law. Please note that all email addresses have changed and now follow
the convention: firstname.lastname@xxxxxxxxxxx. For more information on the
University of New Hampshire School of Law, please visit law.unh.edu
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|