<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] Meeting with the GAC and ccNSO lunch topics
- To: cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: RE: [council] Meeting with the GAC and ccNSO lunch topics
- From: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 07:46:33 -0700
- Cc: olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx, council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Message_id: <20101205074633.4a871ae7d05d2c98d9abb595d392cd69.7d8d41647b.wbe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Right. And I think we agreed to review Liz's document during lunch to
prepare for that discussion so we don't blindside each other during it.
Tim
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [council] Meeting with the GAC and ccNSO lunch topics
> From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Sun, December 05, 2010 7:58 am
> To: <olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx>, <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> The topic for the joint meeting agreed to by Chris and Heather was CWGs.
>
> Chuck
>
>
>
>
> From: Olga Cavalli [mailto:olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Sunday, December 05, 2010 07:24 AM
> To: GNSO Council
> Subject: [council] Meeting with the GAC and ccNSO lunch topics
>
>
> Hi,
>
> In preparation for meeting with GAC and lunch with ccNSO, these are some
> proposed issues to be discussed during these meetings.
>
> Feel free to suggest changes or other subjects that may be of interest.
>
> During lunch today we draft the final list.
>
> Regards
> Olga
>
>
> Meeting with the GAC today 17 hs
>
>
> Comments about New gTLDs and DAGV5
>
> Recommendation 6
>
> Vertical Integration
>
> Cross SO/AC policy development work
>
> http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/draft-cross-so-ac-policy-discussion-28oct10-en.pdf
>
>
>
>
> ccNSO lunch on Monday Thankns Adrei and Edmond for the suggestions!
>
>
> Short update on Fast track from ccNSO team, how
> many applications, how many approved, how many went through IANA
> delegation, how many launched IDN ccTLDs.
>
> There will be a big
> sessions run by ccNSO during this ICANN meeting, but for GNSO this will be
> interesting. This is a direct competition
> for unborn yet gTLDs.
> Edmon�s IRD presentation � on how it will be (should, must, if?) applied
> to ccTLD world. Andrei can reference examples.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Â
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|