<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] Public Comment: Proposed Changes to Enhance ICANN's Registrar Accreditation Evaluation Process
- To: GNSO Council <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] Public Comment: Proposed Changes to Enhance ICANN's Registrar Accreditation Evaluation Process
- From: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 05:36:39 -0800
- Accept-language: fr-FR, en-US
- Acceptlanguage: fr-FR, en-US
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcuS7x0LJJAIBtuFRQ6uEna3kRA2Bg==
- Thread-topic: Public Comment: Proposed Changes to Enhance ICANN's Registrar Accreditation Evaluation Process
http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-2-22nov10-en.htm
Public Comment: Proposed Changes to Enhance ICANN's Registrar Accreditation
Evaluation Process
22 November 2010
The community is invited to provide comments on proposed measures to enhance
ICANN's registrar accreditation evaluation process. Specifically, ICANN is
seeking public comment on:
1. A proposed set of terms and conditions [PDF, 214 KB] for the registrar
accreditation application;
2. The scope of additional proposed due diligence checks;
3. A proposed increase to the registrar accreditation application fee as a
consequence of the need for ICANN to conduct additional information searches to
support the additional due diligence checks.
Background/Explanation of Proposed Measures
ICANN assesses whether an applicant is eligible to become an ICANN-accredited
registrar according to the qualification criteria set out in the Statement of
Registrar Accreditation Policy. The current accreditation evaluation process
includes a review of supporting documents and verification of information
submitted by each applicant against the qualification criteria, in order to
determine if the applicant has sufficient technical, operational and financial
capabilities to become an ICANN-accredited registrar. ICANN also conducts a
background search of the applicant through public sources, which may provide
information or reveal issues that could have a material impact on the
applicant's ability to operate a registrar business in accordance with ICANN's
requirements.
Terms and Conditions
In order to enhance the accreditation process, ICANN recently adopted a new
version of the Accreditation Application Form and amended the section
"Information for Registrars and Registrants" published on its website. To
provide further clarity on the respective obligations of the applicant and
ICANN in relation to the registrar accreditation applications, ICANN proposes
to introduce a set of terms and conditions that will apply to all registrar
accreditation applications. A copy of the proposed terms and conditions is
available here [PDF, 214 KB].
Additional Due Diligence Checks
In addition, members of the community, including representatives of law
enforcement agencies, have recommended a number of areas where ICANN should
focus further due diligence checks of applicants during the registrar
accreditation application process, including:
* Criminal records;
* Credit records;
* Financial history and solvency;
* Corporate/company structure and ownership.
These due diligence checks would require ICANN to complete these inquiries
through the use of external resources (including reputable commercial third
party information service providers).
Proposed Increase in Registrar Accreditation Application Fee
In order to cover the additional third party search costs, ICANN proposes to
increase the application fee for all new registrar accreditation applications
(on a cost recovery basis) from the current fee of USD 2,500 to USD 3,500.
The Process From Here:
At the end of this Public Comment period, ICANN staff will analyze the comments
received and determine the appropriate steps and arrangements that will be
required to introduce the terms and conditions and implement any proposed
additional due diligence checks and the resulting fee increase for registrar
accreditation applications.
Deadline and How to Submit Comments:
Staff is opening a 60-day public consultation forum, from 22 November 2010
through 21 January 2011 and invites community comments concerning these
proposed measures.
* The formal Public Comment Forum Box is located here:
http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/public-comment-201101-en.htm#registrar-accredit-eval
* To submit comments: registrar-accredit-eval@xxxxxxxxx
* To view comments: http://forum.icann.org/lists/registrar-accredit-eval/
Staff Responsible: Steve Gobin
Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat
gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://gnso.icann.org
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|