<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] Cartagena schedule update, Saturday Dec 4
- To: "Stéphane Van Gelder" <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>, owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "GNSO Council" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [council] Cartagena schedule update, Saturday Dec 4
- From: tim@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 11:52:49 +0000
- Importance: Normal
- In-reply-to: <8C5605D0-EDAD-43C5-B647-DA0D93F02A9B@indom.com>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <8C5605D0-EDAD-43C5-B647-DA0D93F02A9B@indom.com>
- Reply-to: tim@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sensitivity: Normal
No doubt this will include a review of the explanatory memo on this topic as
well, right? It explains a lot and is why I believe an endorsement of rec 6 is
not appropriate at this point and would only encourage further delays.
Tim
-----Original Message-----
From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 11:12:16
To: GNSO Council<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [council] Cartagena schedule update, Saturday Dec 4
Hi all,
Please note that we have updated our weekend schedule to reflect a presentation
that Margie has volunteered to make to the Council on Rec6.
This will be part of our lunchtime session, from 13 to 14:00.
Margie has forwarded the following agenda for her presentation:
1. Overview of the CWG Rec6 Report Recommendations
2. Overview of Recent Events including Board Resolutions, Final Proposed
Applicant Guidebook treatment, and CWG Consultation
3. Discussion of Motion to Endorse
4. Q&A
Thanks,
Stéphane
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|