<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] Motion deadline per operating procedures
- To: "'Tim Ruiz'" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [council] Motion deadline per operating procedures
- From: "Rosette, Kristina" <krosette@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 12:45:11 -0500
- Accept-language: en-US
- Acceptlanguage: en-US
- Cc: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <20101201174258.30786.qmail@mm03.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcuRf1xwgOLWLJPcQCWcjAez9rUtzwAAA5ow
- Thread-topic: [council] Motion deadline per operating procedures
I can't stop you from raising your view as a point of order. Let's spend some
of our Council meeting discussing it as it's clearly a matter of great concern
to you.
________________________________
From: Tim Ruiz [mailto:tim@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 12:43 PM
To: Rosette, Kristina
Cc: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [council] Motion deadline per operating procedures
Not sure how "at least 8 days" can be interpreted as anything but eight
24 hour periods, at least on this planet. If it was intended to mean
anything different it would have been defined as such (8 days or any
part thereof). A "day" is universally accepted as meaning 24 hours.
Tim
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: RE: [council] Motion deadline per operating procedures
> From: "Rosette, Kristina"
> Date: Wed, December 01, 2010 11:20 am
> To: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Because Section 3.3 says "days", the motion was timely as
> long as it was submitted on the 30th, which it was.
>
> If, going forward, the Council wishes to adopt Tim's
> interpretation, we should amend Section 3.3 to change "8 days" to "192
> hours". Unless and until such an amendment, my motion was
> timely.
>
>
>
>
>
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tim
> Ruiz
> Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 12:00 PM
> To:
> council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [council] Motion deadline per
> operating procedures
>
>
>
> The relevant paragraph in section 3.3 of our operating
> procedures
> clearly states that motions must be submitted "...no later than
> 8 days
> before the GNSO Council meeting." Given that our meeting is
> scheduled to
> begin at 1900 UTC on the 8th, neither of the motions submitted
> yesterday
> by Mary and Kristina met the deadline of 1900 UTC the
> 30th.
>
> Again, given that ICANN involves one or more days of travel for
> many of
> us, and that any 8 day period also includes at least one weekend,
> I
> think it is crucial that motions are submitted as soon as possible
> and
> the deadline should be strictly
> observed.
>
> Tim
>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|