Re: [council] Motion to extend PPSC and OSC charters

[Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hello,

I second Wendy motion.

Regards

Rafik


2010/11/29 Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

>
> Wendy,
>
> I am assuming this is a second motion and, if that is correct, it will be
> treated as such.
>
> Chuck
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Wendy Seltzer [mailto:wendy@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Monday, November 29, 2010 9:36 AM
> > Cc: Gomes, Chuck; GNSO Council
> > Subject: Re: [council] Motion to extend PPSC and OSC charters
> >
> > I think it's clear that "more work needs to be done," but I would
> > recommend that the Council as a whole take on the task or re-delegate
> > it.  Our recent dissatisfaction with the DOI language suggests to me
> > that we all need to review these matters more carefully, and we're not
> > helped by delegating them.  Rather than exhausting these committees'
> > volunteers, let's thank them and move on.
> >
> > I propose this alternative motion (borrowing the initial whereases):
> >
> > >> Whereas in October 2008, the GNSO Council established a framework
> > for
> > implementing the various GNSO Improvements identified and approved by
> > the ICANN Board of Directors (see - GNSO Council Improvements
> > Implementation Plan)
> > >>
> > http://www.icann.org/en/topics/gnso-improvements/gnso-improvements-
> > implementation-plan-16oct08.pdf;
> > >>
> > >> Whereas that framework included the formation of two Steering
> > Committees - the Operations Steering Committee and the Policy Process
> > Steering Committee - to charter and coordinate the efforts of five
> > community work teams designed to develop specific recommendations to
> > implement specific aspects of the improvements;
> >
> > Whereas the OSC and PPSC charters expire at the Cartagena meeting;
> >
> > RESOLVED the Council acknowledges the hard work of those work teams and
> > thanks them for providing any final reports they wish to offer.
> >
> > On 11/29/2010 03:59 AM, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:
> > > It's clear that the 2 SCs need to continue to work. Just our recent
> > conversations re such things as the DOI recommendations or the voting
> > procedures show that more work needs to be done. However, I would also
> > like to ask where we are with regards to the oversight committee that
> > there was talk of forming? Could that not also help move things in the
> > right direction?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Stéphane
> > >
> > > Le 28 nov. 2010 à 05:36, Gomes, Chuck a écrit :
> > >
> > >> Rob kindly reminded me that the latest extensions of the PPSC and
> > OSC end in Cartagena.  Because both SC's and some of their WTs are
> > still working, I am submitting this motion to extend their charters
> > further.
> > >>
> > >> Whereas in October 2008, the GNSO Council established a framework
> > for implementing the various GNSO Improvements identified and approved
> > by the ICANN Board of Directors (see - GNSO Council Improvements
> > Implementation Plan)
> > >> http://www.icann.org/en/topics/gnso-improvements/gnso-improvements-
> > implementation-plan-16oct08.pdf;
> > >>
> > >> Whereas that framework included the formation of two Steering
> > Committees - the Operations Steering Committee and the Policy Process
> > Steering Committee - to charter and coordinate the efforts of five
> > community work teams designed to develop specific recommendations to
> > implement specific aspects of the improvements;
> > >>
> > >> Whereas the Council intended the charters of the committees (and
> > their attendant work teams) to be temporary and not to extend beyond
> > the 2009 annual ICANN meeting without specific action by the Council;
> > >>
> > >> Whereas the Council has now twice extended the terms of those
> > committees to allow the GNSO community implementation recommendations
> > work to continue (see - http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/minutes-council-
> > 24sep09.htm and http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/minutes-council-10mar10-
> > en.htm);
> > >>
> > >> Whereas the Council acknowledges the hard work of those work teams
> > and notes that those committees and their teams are diligently
> > continuing their work;
> > >>
> > >> RESOLVED, The Council extends the terms of the Operations Steering
> > Committee and the Policy Process Steering Committee and their
> > respective work teams as necessary through the San Francisco ICANN
> > public meeting in March 2011. The Council directs each steering
> > committee and applicable work team chair to identify the specific
> > targets and benchmarks for their work and to share that information
> > with the Council by 19 January 2011.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Wendy Seltzer -- wendy@xxxxxxxxxxx +1 914-374-0613
> > Fellow, Princeton Center for Information Technology Policy
> > Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University
> > http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/seltzer.html
> > http://www.chillingeffects.org/
> > https://www.torproject.org/donate        <<        please donate!
> > http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/
>
>