RE: [council] Motion to extend PPSC and OSC charters

["Mary Wong" <Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks, Liz.
 
I agree with Wendy that recent events show that the Council should now
review the work done before re-delegating (and yeah, I'm willing to work
on that review). I think also that Stephane's reminder about the
Standing Committee is timely, and it may be that we can convene that
Committee to work together with the Council to review the OSC and PPSC
work, at least initially.
 
With that in mind, my question is - will there be any problem (e.g.
legal/rule-based, technical, operational etc. etc.) if Wendy's motion is
amended so as to extend the PPSC charter solely for the purpose of, and
only for the duration of, completion of the PDP team's work? 
 
Thanks,
Mary
 


 
 
Mary W S Wong
Professor of Law
Chair, Graduate IP Programs
UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAWTwo White StreetConcord, NH
03301USAEmail: mary.wong@xxxxxxx.eduPhone: 1-603-513-5143Webpage:
http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.phpSelected writings available on
the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at:
http://ssrn.com/author=437584>>> 


From: Liz Gasster <liz.gasster@xxxxxxxxx>
To:"Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Wendy Seltzer
<wendy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
CC:GNSO Council <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 11/29/2010 12:03 PM
Subject: RE: [council] Motion to extend PPSC and OSC charters

Wendy and all,

I do want to point out that the OSC and PPSC are actually at very
different stages in their work.  Many tasks that were the responsibility
of the OSC are completed or nearing completion.  The PDP Work Team,
working under the auspices of the PPSC, has more work to do before
completing its primary "assignments". 

Thanks, Liz


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2010 6:43 AM
To: Wendy Seltzer
Cc: GNSO Council
Subject: RE: [council] Motion to extend PPSC and OSC charters


Wendy,

I am assuming this is a second motion and, if that is correct, it will
be treated as such.

Chuck

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wendy Seltzer [mailto:wendy@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Monday, November 29, 2010 9:36 AM
> Cc: Gomes, Chuck; GNSO Council
> Subject: Re: [council] Motion to extend PPSC and OSC charters
> 
> I think it's clear that "more work needs to be done," but I would 
> recommend that the Council as a whole take on the task or re-delegate

> it.  Our recent dissatisfaction with the DOI language suggests to me

> that we all need to review these matters more carefully, and we're
not 
> helped by delegating them.  Rather than exhausting these committees'
> volunteers, let's thank them and move on.
> 
> I propose this alternative motion (borrowing the initial whereases):
> 
> >> Whereas in October 2008, the GNSO Council established a framework
> for
> implementing the various GNSO Improvements identified and approved by

> the ICANN Board of Directors (see - GNSO Council Improvements 
> Implementation Plan)
> >>
> http://www.icann.org/en/topics/gnso-improvements/gnso-improvements-
> implementation-plan-16oct08.pdf;
> >>
> >> Whereas that framework included the formation of two Steering
> Committees - the Operations Steering Committee and the Policy Process

> Steering Committee - to charter and coordinate the efforts of five 
> community work teams designed to develop specific recommendations to

> implement specific aspects of the improvements;
> 
> Whereas the OSC and PPSC charters expire at the Cartagena meeting;
> 
> RESOLVED the Council acknowledges the hard work of those work teams 
> and thanks them for providing any final reports they wish to offer.
> 
> On 11/29/2010 03:59 AM, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:
> > It's clear that the 2 SCs need to continue to work. Just our
recent
> conversations re such things as the DOI recommendations or the voting

> procedures show that more work needs to be done. However, I would
also 
> like to ask where we are with regards to the oversight committee that

> there was talk of forming? Could that not also help move things in
the 
> right direction?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Stéphane
> >
> > Le 28 nov. 2010 à 05:36, Gomes, Chuck a écrit :
> >
> >> Rob kindly reminded me that the latest extensions of the PPSC and
> OSC end in Cartagena.  Because both SC's and some of their WTs are 
> still working, I am submitting this motion to extend their charters 
> further.
> >>
> >> Whereas in October 2008, the GNSO Council established a framework
> for implementing the various GNSO Improvements identified and
approved 
> by the ICANN Board of Directors (see - GNSO Council Improvements 
> Implementation Plan)
> >>
http://www.icann.org/en/topics/gnso-improvements/gnso-improvements-
> implementation-plan-16oct08.pdf;
> >>
> >> Whereas that framework included the formation of two Steering
> Committees - the Operations Steering Committee and the Policy Process

> Steering Committee - to charter and coordinate the efforts of five 
> community work teams designed to develop specific recommendations to

> implement specific aspects of the improvements;
> >>
> >> Whereas the Council intended the charters of the committees (and
> their attendant work teams) to be temporary and not to extend beyond

> the 2009 annual ICANN meeting without specific action by the
Council;
> >>
> >> Whereas the Council has now twice extended the terms of those
> committees to allow the GNSO community implementation recommendations

> work to continue (see - 
> http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/minutes-council-
> 24sep09.htm and 
> http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/minutes-council-10mar10-
> en.htm);
> >>
> >> Whereas the Council acknowledges the hard work of those work
teams
> and notes that those committees and their teams are diligently 
> continuing their work;
> >>
> >> RESOLVED, The Council extends the terms of the Operations
Steering
> Committee and the Policy Process Steering Committee and their 
> respective work teams as necessary through the San Francisco ICANN 
> public meeting in March 2011. The Council directs each steering 
> committee and applicable work team chair to identify the specific 
> targets and benchmarks for their work and to share that information 
> with the Council by 19 January 2011.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> 
> 
> --
> Wendy Seltzer -- wendy@xxxxxxxxxxx +1 914-374-0613 Fellow, Princeton

> Center for Information Technology Policy Fellow, Berkman Center for 
> Internet & Society at Harvard University 
> http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/seltzer.html
> http://www.chillingeffects.org/
> https://www.torproject.org/donate        <<        please donate!
> http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/





As of August 30, 2010, Franklin Pierce Law Center has affiliated with
the University of New Hampshire and is now known as the University of
New Hampshire School of Law. Please note that all email addresses have
changed and now follow the convention: firstname.lastname@xxxxxxxxxxx.
For more information on the University of New Hampshire School of Law,
please visit law.unh.edu