RE: SPAM-LOW: Re: [council] Prioritizatio process

["Rosemary Sinclair" <Rosemary.Sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Jaime

 

I've been thru so many formal priority setting processes - using computers, 
sticky notes, ranking scales, etc etc

 

I now think we can only do this in discussion  

 

What confuses me is trying to externalize and express in advance my idea of 
"priorities"

 

All life is negotiation and this is another example ......I think?????????

 

A baseline would be whether the projects fit with the ICANN Strategic Plan and 
AoC but then how do we deal with the "bottom up" nature of community project 
identification???

 

It's what make ICANN such an interesting beast!

 

Cheers

 

Rosemary

 

Rosemary Sinclair

Managing Director, ATUG

Chairman, INTUG

T: +61 2 94958901  F: +61 2 94193889

M: +61 413734490 

Email: rosemary.sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:rosemary.sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxx> 

Skype: rasinclair

 

Please visit the ATUG website for Updates and Information www.atug.com.au 

 

________________________________

From: Jaime Wagner - PowerSelf [mailto:jaime@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Friday, 19 November 2010 2:00 PM
To: Rosemary Sinclair
Cc: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RES: SPAM-LOW: Re: [council] Prioritizatio process

 

Dear Rosemary,

 

The problem still rests in the phrase "if priority is agreed". How to do that 
without a method to score relative value among all councilors?

 

Jaime Wagner

jaime@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Direto (51) 3219-5955  Cel (51) 8126-0916

Geral  (51) 3233-3551  DDG: 0800-703-6366

www.powerself.com.br <http://www.powerself.com.br/> 

 

De: rosemary.sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:rosemary.sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
Enviada em: quinta-feira, 18 de novembro de 2010 10:53
Para: Stéphane Van Gelder; owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Jaime Wagner - 
PowerSelf
Cc: 'Gomes, Chuck'; GNSO Council
Assunto: Re: SPAM-LOW: Re: [council] Prioritizatio process

 

One other way to prioritise is to work backwards from the available resources

If we combine this with a process of reviewing progress being made on policy 
issues

we get to a practical assessment of what can be done with the resources 
available and what priority the Community is indicating by its actions

So for me we need a process of identifying resources and reviewing progress

Issues that outstanding could be reviewed as part of the Strat Plan/Operations 
planning process - and if priority is agreed, resources could be identified and 
with the possible consequence that some projects may need to be wound up or 
deferred..

Cheers

Rosemary 

Sent from my BlackBerry® from Optus

________________________________

From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx> 

Sender: <owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 

Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 00:15:23 +1100

To: Jaime Wagner - PowerSelf<jaime@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Cc: 'Gomes, Chuck'<cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Subject: SPAM-LOW: Re: [council] Prioritizatio process

 

Thanks Jaimie, and here's a short recap of what I was saying, as Chuck 
requested:

 

- Keep a model-based approach but simplify.

- Council Leadership could play a part in suggesting priority projects to 
Council, those suggestions based on model approach.

- Or we could take our thinking "outside the box". One idea: use US Congress 
style system of wiping the slate clean at the end of each calendar year. Others 
will no doubt have different ideas to suggest as well.

 

Stéphane 

 

Le 18 nov. 2010 à 13:09, Jaime Wagner - PowerSelf a écrit :

 

Chuck,

 

As you asked me to put in writing my thoughts shared during today's call on 
prioritization of GNSO work, here they are.

 

I would like the Council to consider doing an annual update of the process 
brought up by the WG, because of two benefits

 

1)      Improving general awareness by the Councli members of the work going on;

2)      A valuable tool for leadership in figuring the degree of consensus on 
the relative value of the different projects.

 

Jaime Wagner

jaime@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Direto (51) 3219-5955  Cel (51) 8126-0916

Geral  (51) 3233-3551  DDG: 0800-703-6366

www.powerself.com.br <http://www.powerself.com.br/>