RE: [council] GNSO-GAC meeting in Cartagena

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Bill,

Your suggestions fit nicely into the topic that has already been
selected by all three groups (GNSO, GAC & ccNSO) based on the paper that
Liz produced regarding what needs to be done in the future regarding
community WGs.  It seems natural to me to talk about successes and
failures of the Rec6 CWG and the JAS WG as we explore how we facilitate
CWGs going forward.

Chuck

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-
> council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of William Drake
> Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 7:37 AM
> To: GNSO Council List
> Subject: [council] GNSO-GAC meeting in Cartagena
> 
> 
> Hi
> 
> On tomorrow's call we are to discuss "6.2 Topic(s) for Joint meetings
> with the GAC & ccNSO"
> 
> We've just had two intensive and successful group collaborations on
> questions of particular interest to the GAC, namely Rec. 6/former MAPO
> and JAS/applicant support.  Wouldn't it be helpful to hear GAC
> perspectives and engage in some dialogue with them on a) the outputs
of
> these groups, and how well they speak to concerns GAC has raised in
the
> past, and b) how those outputs should be dealt with going forward?
> Given all the efforts expended and the pressing need to settle this
> stuff to the community's satisfaction, one would think this is the
best
> way we could use the time.  Unless of course we'd prefer to talk about
> categories :-)
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> Best,
> 
> Bill
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ***********************************************************
> William J. Drake
> Senior Associate
> Centre for International Governance
> Graduate Institute of International and
>  Development Studies
> Geneva, Switzerland
> william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> www.williamdrake.org
> ***********************************************************
> 
>