<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] MOTION REFERRING TO THE GNSO COUNCIL OPERATIONS PROCEDURES WORK TEAM (GCOT) RECOMMENDATIONS
- To: <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>, <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>, <ray@xxxxxxxxx>, <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [council] MOTION REFERRING TO THE GNSO COUNCIL OPERATIONS PROCEDURES WORK TEAM (GCOT) RECOMMENDATIONS
- From: "Mike Rodenbaugh" <icann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 10:48:36 -0800
- Cc: <gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx>, <gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx>, <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Steve DelBianco'" <sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "John Berard" <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <592F47825989E0468B5D719E571C6AEE02D3FA66@s4de8dsaanr.west.t-com.de>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Organization: Rodenbaugh Law
- References: <592F47825989E0468B5D719E571C6AEE02D3FA66@s4de8dsaanr.west.t-com.de>
- Reply-to: <icann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcuFeoVpa0H4eMLOSZGsMDVZciktTwARB3yQ
Hi, I am unclear whether these revisions were reviewed and approved by the
OSC? If so, that should be stated clearly in the motion, that the
deliverables are from OSC rather than any work team underneath that Steering
Committee. If not, then OSC needs to approve them and send to us. Please
help to clarify this.
Thanks,
Mike
Mike Rodenbaugh
RODENBAUGH LAW
tel/fax: +1 (415) 738-8087
<http://rodenbaugh.com/> http://rodenbaugh.com
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 2:39 AM
To: philip.sheppard@xxxxxx; ray@xxxxxxxxx; stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx; gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [council] MOTION REFERRING TO THE GNSO COUNCIL OPERATIONS
PROCEDURES WORK TEAM (GCOT) RECOMMENDATIONS
Colleagues,
The first "Resolved" of the a.m. motion (see
<https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?18_november_motions>
https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?18_november_motions) reads:
RESOLVED, that the GNSO Council accepts these deliverables submitted
by the GCOT and approved by the OSC and directs Staff to post the
aforementioned document for thirty (30) days in the ICANN Public Comment
Forum.
I wonder whether the GCOT has submitted and the OSC has approved the
proposed revisions to section 5.0 in the version presented. To my knowledge
the OSC approval was given including the DOI. In this case I'd like to
suggest a friendly amendment as follows:
RESOLVED, that the GNSO Council accepts these deliverables submitted
by the GCOT and approved by the OSC and directs Staff to post the
aforementioned document for thirty (30) days in the ICANN Public Comment
Forum
Philp's and Ray's advise would be helpful.
There are still references to DOI left in the revision which I've removed
(see attached).
Wolf-Ulrich Knoben
<<GNSO Operating Procedures v2 Section 5 Proposed Revisions without DOI 15
Oct 2010 redline (WUK_edit).doc>>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|