<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] Interim Report of the Internationalized Registration Data Working Group
- To: Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] Interim Report of the Internationalized Registration Data Working Group
- From: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 04:28:07 -0800
- Accept-language: fr-FR, en-US
- Acceptlanguage: fr-FR, en-US
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcuFFgGfaxadLpqESWq/dOBe8jpwOAAZ9EVwAAL0lgA=
- Thread-topic: Interim Report of the Internationalized Registration Data Working Group
http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-15nov10-en.htm
________________________________
Interim Report of the Internationalized Registration Data Working Group
15 November 2010
Background/Explanation:
On 26 June 2009 the Board of Directors of the Internet Corporate for Assigned
Names and Numbers (ICANN) approved a resolution
(2009.06.26.18<http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/resolutions-26jun09.htm#6>)
requesting that the Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO) and the
Security and Stability Advisory Committee (SSAC), in consultation with staff,
convene an Internationalized Registration Data Working Group (IRD-WG) comprised
of individuals with knowledge, expertise, and experience in these areas to
study the feasibility and suitability of introducing display specifications to
deal with the internationalization of registration data.
The Board further directed the IRD-WG to solicit input from interested
constituencies including country code top level domain (ccTLD) operators and
the Country Code Names Supporting Organization (ccNSO) during its discussions
to ensure broad community input. Subsequently, the SSAC and the GNSO formed the
IRD-WG.
This Interim Report of the IRD-WG summarizes the discussions of the IRD-WG to
date, provides preliminary recommendations, and seeks input from the community
on the following questions relating to internationalized registration data:
1. Which of the four models described in Section 4 for internationalizing
registration contact data is most appropriate, if any? Are there other models
the IRD-WG should consider?
2. Which of the preliminary recommendations in Section 5, if any, are
feasible? Are there related recommendations the IRD-WG should consider?
The Interim Report provides the community with an opportunity to understand
ongoing discussions relating to the internationalization of registration data
and to provide valuable input to these discussions.
At the direction of the IRD-WG, staff will post this Interim Report for public
comment for a period of no less than 60 days.
Document Links:
Interim Report of the ICANN Internationalized Registration Data Working Group:
http://gnso.icann.org/issues/ird/ird-wg-final-report-15nov10-en.pdf [PDF, 688
KB]
The Process From Here:
At the end of this Public Comment Forum period, ICANN Staff will review the
comments submitted and prepare a summary analysis of the various submissions
for the IRD-WG to review and consider.
Deadline and How to Submit Comments:
At the direction of the IRD-WG, staff will post this Interim Report for public
comment for a period of no less than 60 days beginning 15 November 2010 and
ending 13 January 2011. Translations into the six United Nations languages
will be posted as soon as they are available. The IRD-WG invites community
comments on this document and, in particular, the questions provided above.
The formal Public Comment Forum Box is located here:
http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/public-comment-201101-en.htm#ird
To submit comments: ird-wg-report@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ird-wg-report@xxxxxxxxx>
To view comments: http://forum.icann.org/lists/ird-wg-report/
Staff Responsible: Julie Hedlund
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|