<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] ICANN Board Votes to Enhance New gTLDs Competition
- To: "'Council GNSO'" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [council] ICANN Board Votes to Enhance New gTLDs Competition
- From: "Andrei Kolesnikov" <andrei@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 09:20:41 +0300
- In-reply-to: <03b801cb8103$a94afce0$fbe0f6a0$@com>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <8CEF048B9EC83748B1517DC64EA130FB43C2D19145@off-win2003-01.ausregistrygroup.local> <03b801cb8103$a94afce0$fbe0f6a0$@com>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcuAp28JpjzXqpdBQFGbiK+kpbzibQAWyFZwABlrBfA=
Anyone applause me for giving zero priority to VI during Brussels exercise?
J
--andrei
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Mike Rodenbaugh
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 9:18 PM
To: 'Adrian Kinderis'; 'Council GNSO'
Subject: RE: [council] ICANN Board Votes to Enhance New gTLDs Competition
Yeah Adrian, what next. maybe the CEO of a major registry service provider
will represent the Registrars Constituency on Council?! That would be
shocking!
In any event, I applaud the Board for making a wise decision in the face of
intense pressure from some of the companies that write the biggest checks to
ICANN. It is a good lesson to the GNSO, that the Board will take decisive
action when consensus process fails, based on reasoned analysis and
fundamental principles.
Mike Rodenbaugh
RODENBAUGH LAW
tel/fax: +1 (415) 738-8087
http://rodenbaugh.com <http://rodenbaugh.com/>
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Adrian Kinderis
Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 11:18 PM
To: Council GNSO
Subject: [council] ICANN Board Votes to Enhance New gTLDs Competition
Wow!
http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-09nov10-en.htm
So what happens to the Contracted Party house? Did they think of that? ;)
Adrian Kinderis
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|