ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [council] JAS WG charter extension motion

  • To: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>, Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>, "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [council] JAS WG charter extension motion
  • From: Adrian Kinderis <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 15:28:26 +1100
  • Accept-language: en-US, en-AU
  • Acceptlanguage: en-US, en-AU
  • In-reply-to: <AANLkTinE-A2pJOCVxaotUXovstwHCn8iBMf1m7Q-_ump@mail.gmail.com>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <AANLkTinE-A2pJOCVxaotUXovstwHCn8iBMf1m7Q-_ump@mail.gmail.com>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcuA8K5/goRpjEi5SSWkSrplJG5MgQAXXvJg
  • Thread-topic: [council] JAS WG charter extension motion
Wow.

This is some motion. Interesting that it is slipped in during all the commotion 
of VI etc.

I am still at a bit of a loss to understand this.

You are now reaching out to Registry Back end Service providers and assuming 
that ICANN play a role in supporting the payment of their services? Where does 
this end?

I would love, personally, to have a license for mobile spectrum in Australia. I 
cannot afford it, therefore I don’t. My bad luck. I am not sure this is too 
much different. I am not sure why support needs to be granted on any level here.

Originally, I agreed because we were discussing the supporting the development 
of the application itself. Some folks may have troubles in doing so (especially 
non English speakers etc). It seems to now be stretching much much further than 
this.

I have yet to speak to my Stakeholder group on this topic but I assume we 
wouldn’t be supportive of this motion.

Adrian Kinderis


From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Rafik Dammak
Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 3:01 AM
To: Council GNSO; Glen de Saint Géry; Gomes, Chuck
Subject: [council] JAS WG charter extension motion


Hello,

I want to submit this motion for JAS WG charter extension in response to ICANN 
board resolution about supporting applicants and for completion a list of 
further work items.

Regards

Rafik
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>