[council] RE: Question re: Second SOI/DOI Motion

[Adrian Kinderis <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I second SVG's motion.

We don't need 'em.

Adrian Kinderis


From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 9:10 AM
To: Council GNSO
Subject: [council] FW: Question re: Second SOI/DOI Motion

In our last Council meeting, there was discussion of two different possible 
motions regarding the requirement for Disclosures of Interests in th GNSO 
Operating Procedures.  Stéphane already made a motion to delete the 
requirement.  The other alternative discussed was to modify the procedures as 
proposed by the GCOT; a motion to that effect is attached.  If anyone wants to 
make this alternative motion, please do so by Wednesday, 9 November.

Chuck

From: Julie Hedlund [mailto:julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 3:11 PM
To: Gomes, Chuck
Cc: Liz Gasster; Robert Hoggarth; Glen de Saint Géry
Subject: Question re: Second SOI/DOI Motion

Chuck,

I think that there were two possible motions concerning the SOI/DOI procedures 
arising from the last GNSO Council meeting.  One was that which Stephane 
requested, which was the version of the SOI/DOI procedures provided by the Work 
Team but without the DOI procedure.  I am not sure, but I thought you also 
asked for a motion on the version provided by the Work Team in which the DOI 
procedures were not deleted.  If so, I have prepared for your consideration a 
motion along those lines and the accompanying revised procedures.  The motion 
is the same as the one I provided to Stephane except for the fact that the DOI 
procedures are not deleted.  Let me know if this is useful to you and, if so, 
whether you would like me to make any changes.

Thanks,
Julie