<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] DOI motion
- To: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>, Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [council] DOI motion
- From: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 08:04:11 -0700
- Accept-language: fr-FR, en-US
- Acceptlanguage: fr-FR, en-US
- In-reply-to: <26036898-8AF2-4A42-8DC4-5D5AAAE84ABD@indom.com>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <26036898-8AF2-4A42-8DC4-5D5AAAE84ABD@indom.com>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: Act8MKdrV6FKQs3ZT+ilH+DKBtE8+AAALPBw
- Thread-topic: [council] DOI motion
Stéphane,
Would you like me to get a link for the attachment which will be neater ? I
could get the attachment posted on draft docs.
Thanks
Glen
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder
Sent: jeudi 4 novembre 2010 15:56
To: Council GNSO
Subject: [council] DOI motion
Hi everyone,
As discussed during our last conference call, I would like to make the
following motion to remove the DOI obligations from the GNSO Op Procs. Included
is my proposal for the motion plus a revised version of the Op Procs with the
DOI requirement removed (document is provided as a redline to make the changes
clearer).
My thanks to Julie Hedlund for her help in preparing this.
Comments and a second are most welcome.
Thanks,
Stéphane
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|