<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] Regarding support for needy applicants
- To: Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [council] Regarding support for needy applicants
- From: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 17:46:28 +0900
- Cc: Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=3h7fq1Cyc0qERFka7IcD3KeBL8yDurc3lotVV1CzhkA=; b=HPq89wwoFkX9p2wlthSYZFBinI1JoKlJ0VhkBnhBKONZrjdv5+Whftu3Im94OZmXok wJA3XMEVhlENERSCodNwXHzjcU9jGllRxMOGmJHTr+mMzXawPOfKugfvOi1xl6u1X+im RQz3pKRZp8LlQ3nJ/ltcCIAI8X2qu001JcdIg=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=hZArOLsKGDhh5MTs0kYpGUp41wYP6wkBxUTtl5pxfCpDLgWEMbNkihYwB7SMeQYtsH QUtZRv+euty8nmZq3JV7yDJVj3TAJSTXCJO1lGXrf31rq42y3bNvtTzsLR6VEQIKen1j W+y7ENzcczq2sBCZnEaGp99axzOdgwDuMcoHc=
- In-reply-to: <B7ACC01E42881F4981F66BA96FC14957052264C6@WIC001MITEBCLV1.messaging.mit>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <B7ACC01E42881F4981F66BA96FC14957052264C6@WIC001MITEBCLV1.messaging.mit>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thanks Bruce,
Rafik
2010/11/3 Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Hello All,
>
> Rafik requested that I post my response to his question about the board
> resolution on needy applicants.
>
> Regards,
> Bruce Tonkin
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bruce Tonkin
> Sent: Friday, 29 October 2010 11:55 PM
> To: 'Rafik Dammak'
> Subject: RE: [council] ICANN Board resolutions from 28 October 2010 meeting
>
> Hello Rafik,
>
>
>
> >> can you please clarify the Board request about criteria for
> eligibility?
>
> The report from the working group stated:
>
> 'The primary criterion for eligibility is financial need. The definition
> of financial need and the method for determining the needs of an application
> has not been established by the WG at this time."
>
> So I believe that the Board is suggesting that further work be done in that
> area.
>
> Important considerations would be criteria for how to identify needy
> applicants, how many such applicants there is likely to be, how to select
> amongst needy applicants if there is limited funding, who would make that
> selection etc.
>
>
> Regards,
> Bruce Tonkin
>
>
>
>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|