<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] ICANN staff
- To: Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] ICANN staff
- From: Adrian Kinderis <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 12:14:56 +1100
- Accept-language: en-US, en-AU
- Acceptlanguage: en-US, en-AU
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: Act4mQetCP4oVyUBSi2d0H8nPCq63Q==
- Thread-topic: ICANN staff
Chuck,
Quick question.
Is it the Council's place or business to question the status of staffing at
ICANN?
I may be reading this wrong but there seems to have been a spike in staff
turnover in the last 12 months.
I could be wrong and this could simply be a case of normal activity but it
causes some concern to me when we have a particularly important 12 months. I am
sure we would all like to ensure that ICANN is appropriately staffed, with
talented and importantly, DNS experienced people to progress the strategic plan
and that the existing staff are supported and managed through this stressful
period.
As I say, I am not sure it is our place to question or comment.
Perhaps we could notify our representatives on the Board that we believe it to
be an issue, if indeed we deem it to be one?
Thanks.
Adrian Kinderis
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|