RE: [council] Kurt Question

["Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Seems that the Board should have asked for a release candidate in
conjunction with the recent resolutions. Perhaps that is the intent,
with the few more or less clean up items that were noted. At least I
certainly hope so. 


Tim

> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: RE: [council] Kurt Question
> From: Adrian Kinderis <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Fri, October 08, 2010 12:52 am
> To: Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,        Council GNSO
> <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Thanks Bruce. Very firm. I like it.
> 
> However, it is all in how you look at it.
> 
> The staff can certainly put something forward that they may consider "final" 
> and yes the Board may not approve it. However, the staff could still have 
> thought that they were "final".
> 
> My question was to Kurt, and therefore staff, in that, does he believe that 
> the next version will be the one they expect the Board to sign off on or will 
> it be sent back for public comment.
> 
> A legitimate question given staff's history of announcing that they expect 
> future drafts every time they have released one.
> 
> A response would be appreciated.
> 
> Adrian Kinderis
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
> Behalf Of Bruce Tonkin
> Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 3:50 PM
> To: Council GNSO
> Subject: RE: [council] Kurt Question
> 
> 
> Hello Adrian,
> 
> 
> >>  Does that mean there will be others and the next won't be "final"?
> 
> It will be final when the Board approves it.  Until then it is always a
> draft.
> 
> Regards,
> Bruce Tonkin