<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] RE: Motion re. VI WG
Thanks Chuck.
It sounds negative to me.
Why not put something that reflects that, "whilst many different issues were
discussed and many different models reviewed, consensus among the stakeholders
within the WG could not be reached".
I would also add something like; "the interim report previously provided will
now me marked final and submitted as appropriate".
Does this help?
Adrian Kinderis
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 3:53 AM
To: Council GNSO
Subject: [council] Motion re. VI WG
<<Motion - VI Board Response 29 Sep 10.doc>>
In response to the Board retreat resolution regarding VI and in order to meet
the 8-day advance requirement for motions, I am submitting this motion and
would appreciate a second. Please forward this to your SGs and constituencies
to determine support for the motion on 7 October.
I am not opposed to other ways of accomplishing this, but thought that a motion
is a clear way to kick it off.
Chuck
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|