<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] Vertical Integration
- To: adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: RE: [council] Vertical Integration
- From: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 07:19:12 -0700
- Cc: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Message_id: <20100927071912.4a871ae7d05d2c98d9abb595d392cd69.7a08a8906f.wbe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Agreed. We should at least have this issue on the agenda for the
upcoming meeting.
Tim
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [council] Vertical Integration
> From: Adrian Kinderis <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Sun, September 26, 2010 9:07 pm
> To: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> It looks like the Board punted this... yet again.
>
>
>
> http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/resolutions-25sep10-en.htm#2.11
>
>
>
> Can’t we just send them the letter already?
>
>
>
> This was my idea from the start. Call the WG closed, mark the
> interim report final and let’s move on.
>
>
>
> Adrian Kinderis
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|