<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] FW: [soac-discussion] DNS SSR & WHOIS RT Composition
- To: "GNSO Council" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] FW: [soac-discussion] DNS SSR & WHOIS RT Composition
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 19:27:14 -0400
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcsunsGOAAEqSlOXQ3WsD6VIESAOnwAAA+bwAANbwWA=
- Thread-topic: [soac-discussion] DNS SSR & WHOIS RT Composition
Here's a revised summary of the SSR & Whois RT compositions, correcting
the number ALAC representatives with no change to the GNSO numbers.
Chuck
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-soac-discussion@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-soac-discussion@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Heather.Dryden@xxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 5:51 PM
To: alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx; soac-discussion@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: rod.beckstrom@xxxxxxxxx; olof.nordling@xxxxxxxxx;
alice.jansen@xxxxxxxxx; donna.austin@xxxxxxxxx; denise.michel@xxxxxxxxx;
massimiliano.minisci@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [soac-discussion] DNS SSR & WHOIS RT Composition
Ack!! You're correct (this is what happens drafting emails at the end of
the day). My apologies. Changes made below.
-----Original Message-----
From: Alan Greenberg [mailto:alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 5:48 PM
To: Dryden, Heather: SPS; soac-discussion@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: rod.beckstrom@xxxxxxxxx; olof.nordling@xxxxxxxxx;
alice.jansen@xxxxxxxxx; donna.austin@xxxxxxxxx; denise.michel@xxxxxxxxx;
massimiliano.minisci@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [soac-discussion] DNS SSR & WHOIS RT Composition
Importance: High
Heather, I am confused. Last Friday, Rod sent out a note saying that
ALAC had 1 seat on the SS&R RT and 2 on the WHOIS RT (reproduced below).
Alan
>>From: Rod Beckstrom <rod.beckstrom@xxxxxxxxx>
>>To: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>, Heather Dryden
>> <heather.dryden@xxxxxxxx>, "soac-discussion@xxxxxxxxx"
>> <soac-discussion@xxxxxxxxx>
>>CC: Donna Austin <donna.austin@xxxxxxxxx>, Massimiliano Minisci
>> <massimiliano.minisci@xxxxxxxxx>
>>Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 13:12:51 -0400
>>Subject: Re: [soac-discussion] FW: Communication with ACSO on the next
RTs
>>
>>Dear Alan-
>>
>>We have heard the ALAC concerns and agreed to move the 2 ALAC seats
>>from the S&S RT to the Whois Review team, so the current framework
>>allows for up to 3 GAC seats on Whois and 2 ALAC seats.
>>
>>ALAC will now have one seat on the S&S, as will the GAC.
>>
>>Many thanks,
>>
>>Rod
At 28/07/2010 05:35 PM, Heather.Dryden@xxxxxxxx wrote:
>Dear Chairs/Vice-chairs,
>
>I am writing to inform you that Rod and I have agreed to the following
>composition of the two new Review Teams in order that this can be
>communicated to your respective constituencies. We have endeavoured to
>align the identified priorities of the various constituencies with the
>composition of each Review Team.
>
>I understand that there will be a public announcement to follow. Best,
>Heather
>
>
>Security, Stability and Resiliency
>
>GAC Chair or Designate 1
>GAC 1
>GNSO 3
>ccNSO 2
>ALAC 1
>SSAC 2
>RSSAC 1
>ASO 1
>Independent expert 2-3
>CEO 1
>
>
>WHOIS
>
>GAC Chair or Designate 1
>GAC 3
>GNSO 4
>ccNSO 1
>ALAC 2
>SSAC 1
>RSSAC
>ASO 1
>Independent expert 2-3 (not seeking endorsement from an SO
or
>AC)
>CEO 1
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|