<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: FW: [council] EXTENSION OF DEADLINE - Call for Applicants for a Position of Volunteer Review Team Member - 29 July 2010
- To: "GNSO Council " <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: FW: [council] EXTENSION OF DEADLINE - Call for Applicants for a Position of Volunteer Review Team Member - 29 July 2010
- From: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 08:58:12 -0700
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Reply-to: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Web-Based Email 5.2.23
I think we should live with the extension and each SG can do what it
needs to, when it needs to, in order to endorse its candidate. That may
mean some late applicants will not be considered by one SG or another,
but that is likely a reality either way.
Tim
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: FW: [council] EXTENSION OF DEADLINE - Call for Applicants for
a Position of Volunteer Review Team Member - 29 July 2010
From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, July 16, 2010 10:33 am
To: "Council GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Please note the suggestion in item b below from Olof. It seems like a
good solution to me but I would like feedback from Councilors in
consultation with your respective groups. This of course is time
sensitive so please respond right away as possible.
Chuck
-----Original Message-----
From: Olof Nordling [mailto:olof.nordling@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 11:09 AM
To: Gomes, Chuck; William Drake
Cc: Glen de Saint Géry; Council GNSO; soac-discussion@xxxxxxxxx; Alice
Jansen; Donna Austin
Subject: RE: [council] EXTENSION OF DEADLINE - Call for Applicants for a
Position of Volunteer Review Team Member - 29 July 2010
Chuck,
I think you know that this change occurred with the best of intentions
and that there was a technical mishap in the necessarily short time
frame for the attempted, but derailed, consultation. That aside, I did
the call and I take the blame for the unintended consequences.
Now, how can we best redress the situation?
a) Is the suggested correction of the announcement the best way to go?
b) If not, counting 45 days from 29 July gives 12 September as delivery
date for the GNSO endorsed candidate list. In my response to you about
the 45 days, I used the phrase "best effort" regarding the end of August
deadline. Although certainly putting a squeeze on the sequence of events
to precede the launch deadline, I think that is doable, the selectors
agendas so permitting.
Please advice on the above.
Thanks
Olof
-----Original Message-----
From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 4:24 PM
To: Olof Nordling; William Drake
Cc: Glen de Saint Géry; Council GNSO; soac-discussion@xxxxxxxxx; Alice
Jansen; Donna Austin
Subject: RE: [council] EXTENSION OF DEADLINE - Call for Applicants for a
Position of Volunteer Review Team Member - 29 July 2010
Olof,
Holding off is the right thing to do Olof. I was trying to stop the
confusion as quickly as possible but that didn't work.
It is critical that a decision like this never be handled in this manner
again. And it is totally unreasonable to expect the GNSO to compact an
already cramped process into an even shorter time frame without
concurrence from the GNSO. I agree with others that extensions are
common and generally good but doing so without comparable extensions for
other deadlines should not happen without agreement that those impacted
can live with the changes.
I had specifically requested 45 days for GNSO processes and that was
granted. Moreover, the process the Council approved was fully public so
it should not come as a surprise that we required time to implement our
endorsement process. Unfortunately, all that seemed to be completely
ignored in the decision to extend without extending the corresponding
deadline for SO/AC endorsements.
Chuck
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Olof Nordling [mailto:olof.nordling@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 5:55 AM
> To: William Drake
> Cc: Gomes, Chuck; Glen de Saint Géry; Council GNSO; soac-
> discussion@xxxxxxxxx; Alice Jansen; Donna Austin
> Subject: RE: [council] EXTENSION OF DEADLINE - Call for Applicants for
> a Position of Volunteer Review Team Member - 29 July 2010
>
> Hi Bill,
> Certainly, I'll hold it until notified.
> Best
> Olof
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: William Drake [mailto:william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 11:47 AM
> To: Olof Nordling
> Cc: Gomes, Chuck; Glen de Saint Géry; Council GNSO; soac-
> discussion@xxxxxxxxx; Alice Jansen; Donna Austin
> Subject: Re: [council] EXTENSION OF DEADLINE - Call for Applicants for
> a Position of Volunteer Review Team Member - 29 July 2010
>
> Hi Olof
>
> On Jul 16, 2010, at 11:32 AM, Olof Nordling wrote:
>
> >
> > Dear Chuck,
> > It so happens that there is an error in the recently posted
> announcement - it still displays on the front page with a deadline of
> 15 July - so we need to make a correction anyway. I suggest that we in
> this correction explicitly and clearly exclude GNSO applications from
> the extension. Would that be satisfactory? We could also make an
> additional announcement stating that "Call for GNSO applications is
> closed", if you prefer.
>
> While I've not had time to poll everyone it's a fair bet that as much
> as half the council is opposed to the exclusion, so could you please
> hold off until we come to an understanding on how to proceed?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bill
>
> >
> > I also copy this to the SOAC list (that should work now, I've been
> assured).
> >
> > Very best regards
> > Olof
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-
> council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
> > Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 11:19 PM
> > To: Glen de Saint Géry; Council GNSO
> > Subject: RE: [council] EXTENSION OF DEADLINE - Call for Applicants
> for a Position of Volunteer Review Team Member - 29 July 2010
> > Importance: High
> >
> >
> > Unless further notified to the contrary, this extension will not
> apply to GNSO candidates. The deadline for candidates requesting GNSO
> endorsements remains today, 15 July. I have been told that the GNSO
> must still provide its endorsements by the end of August; we were
> already in a time crunch for implementing our process, it would be
> impossible to follow the approved process with this extension or
> probably for any extension.
> >
> > I apologize for any confusion this may create, but as long as our
> endorsements are due by the end of August, I see no other alternative.
> >
> > Chuck Gomes
> > GNSO Council Chair
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-
> >> council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Glen de Saint Géry
> >> Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 3:37 PM
> >> To: Council GNSO
> >> Subject: [council] EXTENSION OF DEADLINE - Call for Applicants for a
> >> Position of Volunteer Review Team Member - 29 July 2010
> >>
> >>
> >> http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-01jun10-en.htm
> >>
> >> EXTENSION OF DEADLINE - Call for Applicants for a Position of
> Volunteer
> >> Review Team Member
> >>
> >> - Review Team 2: Security, Stability and Resiliency of the DNS -
> >> - Review Team 4: WHOIS Policy -
> >>
> >> Updated: 15 July 2010
> >> 13 July 2010
> >> 1 July 2010
> >> 1 June 2010
> >>
> >> Deadline: 15 July 2010 - 23.59 UTC
> >>
> >> Extended to: 29 July 2010 - 23.59 UTC
> >>
> >> The Affirmation of Commitments calls for a periodic review of four
> key
> >> ICANN objectives, namely:
> >>
> >> 1. Ensuring accountability, transparency and the interests of
> global
> >> Internet users;
> >> 2. Preserving security, stability and resiliency of the DNS;
> >> 3. Promoting competition, consumer trust and consumer choice;
> >> 4. WHOIS policy.
> >>
> >> Affirmation reviews are to be performed by Review Teams composed of
> >> volunteer community Members representing the relevant Supporting
> >> Organizations and Advisory Committees of ICANN. Please refer to the
> >> Affirmation Reviews web space for full reference.
> >>
> >> ICANN now invites interested individuals to apply for a position of
> >> volunteer Review Team Member on the following Review Teams:
> >>
> >> * Preserving security, stability and resiliency of the DNS;
> >> * WHOIS policy.
> >>
> >> This call is solely intended for interested individuals who wish to
> >> apply in representation of a Supporting Organization (SO) or
> Advisory
> >> Committee (AC). Candidatures to serve as independent experts will
> not
> >> be considered.
> >>
> >> Please download the full text of this Call for Applicants [PDF, 101
> >> KB], which contains further instructions and information on the
> >> application procedure for interested candidates.
> >>
> >> Interested candidates, please submit your CV, letter of motivation
> and
> >> SO/AC requirements (if applicable) to rtcandidatures@xxxxxxxxx by 29
> >> July 2010 - 23:59 UTC. SO/AC requirements may be found at:
> >> http://www.icann.org/en/reviews/affirmation/call-for-applicants-2-
> and-
> >> 4-en.htm
> >>
> >> Launch dates and deadlines:
> >>
> >> * 29 July 2010 --> Publication of the list of volunteers
> >> * End of August 2010 --> Endorsement by SO/ACs
> >> * First week of September 2010 --> Selectors announce the RT
> >> Members
> >>
> >> Glen de Saint Géry
> >> GNSO Secretariat
> >> gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> http://gnso.icann.org
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
> ***********************************************************
> William J. Drake
> Senior Associate
> Centre for International Governance
> Graduate Institute of International and
> Development Studies
> Geneva, Switzerland
> william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> www.graduateinstitute.ch/cig/drake.html
> www.linkedin.com/in/williamjdrake
> ***********************************************************
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|