<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] Audiocast
- To: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [council] Audiocast
- From: William Drake <william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 10:09:38 +0200
- Cc: Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <C8625A05.138C5%marika.konings@icann.org>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <C8625A05.138C5%marika.konings@icann.org>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi,
Thanks Marika for moving this forward, option 4 sounds right. I'll be on a
plane during the call but look forward to hearing from folks how it worked.
Best,
Bill
On Jul 13, 2010, at 5:59 PM, Marika Konings wrote:
> Chuck and all,
>
> Yes, as noted we are still waiting for confirmation from our IT team on the
> trial going ahead or not, but as soon as we have further information, we’ll
> let everyone know.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Marika
>
> On 13/07/10 17:29, "Chuck Gomes" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Unfortunately, we do not yet know whether ICANN IT staff will be able to get
>> the trial set up in time. As soon as we know, it would be good for staff to
>> send a message as broadly as possible announcing the trial and all of us
>> should inform our respective groups.
>> Chuck
>>
>> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
>> Behalf Of Mary Wong
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 11:01 AM
>> Cc: Council GNSO; Marika Konings
>> Subject: Re: [council] Audiocast
>>
>>
>> As do I, and thank Marika and the staff for finding and presenting the
>> current options clearly.
>>
>>
>>
>> Will there be (or has there been) a general announcement to the various SGs
>> about the 15 July trial, or should the Councillors inform their respective
>> SGs? I ask also in case there are to be limits on the number of participants
>> for this particular trial run.
>>
>>
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Mary
>>
>>
>>
>> Mary W S Wong
>>
>> Professor of Law & Chair, Graduate IP Programs
>>
>> Franklin Pierce Law Center
>>
>> Two White Street
>>
>> Concord, NH 03301
>>
>> USA
>>
>> Email: mwong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> Phone: 1-603-513-5143
>>
>> Webpage: http://www.piercelaw.edu/marywong/index.php
>>
>> Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN)
>> at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584
>>
>>
>> >>>
>>
>>
>> From: Olga Cavalli <olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx>
>> To: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> CC: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>, Council GNSO
>> <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: 7/12/2010 10:24 PM
>> Subject: Re: [council] Audiocast
>> I agree with the trial.
>> Regards
>> Olga
>>
>>
>>
>> 2010/7/12 Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks Marika. Assuming no Councilor objections, I support the trial run
>> this coming Thursday. That will allow us to fulfill the resolution of
>> starting the service this month and also to evaluate it after the meeting to
>> help us refine future plans.
>>
>> Chuck
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
>> Behalf Of Marika Konings
>> Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 4:37 PM
>> To: Council GNSO
>> Subject: [council] Audiocast
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Dear All,
>>
>> In response to Council Resolution on Enhancing the Transparency of GNSO
>> Council Meetings (20100623-5), the GNSO Policy Staff has explored the
>> different options available with the ICANN IT department to audiocast the
>> GNSO Council meetings going forward. Below you will find an overview of the
>> different options, including possible benefits / disadvantages and a
>> proposed way forward to test and assess the recommended solution as soon as
>> possible.
>>
>> 1. Audiocast via Adobe Connect
>> Description: The conference bridge would be connected via an Adobe Connect
>> room (a separate Adobe Connect room from the GNSO Council Adobe Connect
>> room) so that participants can listen to the audiocast via Adobe Connect.
>> Benefits:
>> § Once system is in place, the GNSO Secretariat can set it up with the
>> assistance of the operator for each conference call so that no additional IT
>> support would be required.
>> Potential disadvantages:
>> § Short delay between real-time audio and audiocast
>> § Requires use of proprietary software
>> § Less suitable for low bandwidth participants
>> § Requires Internet Connection
>> Cost:
>> § Staff resources to set up Adobe Connect room connection for each meeting
>> § One phone connection to audio bridge
>>
>> 2. Separate teleconference-bridge for audiocast participants
>> Description: set up a separate teleconference bridge for audiocast
>> participants. All those on the separate teleconference bridge would then be
>> connected to the Council audio bridge with a muted line.
>> Benefits:
>> § No delay in audiocast
>> § No IT support required
>> § No internet connection required
>> Potential disadvantages:
>> § Requires operator / GNSO Secretariat support (e.g. dial-outs, connection
>> problems)
>> § Potential high costs depending on number of participants
>> § No toll-free numbers available for all countries, although in this case
>> dial-outs can be provided
>> § Requires phone line
>> Cost:
>> § Potentially high, depending on number of participants (toll-free numbers
>> / dial-outs are provided for which the cost range per minute depending on
>> country of origin)
>>
>> 3. Audiocast through web-based interface (similar to how audiocast is
>> provided during ICANN meetings)
>> Description: A stream audio encoder will be set up along with a telephone
>> hybrid. The audio from the conference call will be connected to the stream
>> encoder so that whatever occurs on the conference call will be transmitted
>> to the stream encoder. The stream encoder would them send this to our relay
>> servers and the public could connect to those servers with the URL we
>> provide.
>> Benefits:
>> § Accessible to low bandwidth participants
>> § No proprietary software required to run the audiocast
>> Potential disadvantages:
>> § Approx. 15 second delay between real-time audio and audiocast
>> § Resource intense as it would require IT support for every GNSO Council
>> call to set up audiocast and monitor to ensure quality and continuity.
>> § Requires Internet connection
>> Cost:
>> § IT support time to set up for each call and monitor during the course of
>> the meeting
>> § Audio equipment
>> § One phone connection to audio bridge
>>
>> 4. Automated audiocast stream via web-site
>> Description: A special software programme would be developed which would
>> allow an operator to dial-in to the conference bridge and stream the
>> software via a web control panel.
>> Benefits:
>> § Accessible to low bandwidth participants
>> § No propriety software required to run the audiocast
>> § After initial development, easy to maintain and run by GNSO staff – no
>> continuous IT support required
>> § Apart from initial development, low costs
>> Potential disadvantages:
>> § Approx. 15 second delay between real-time audio and audiocast
>> § Requires Internet connection
>> Cost:
>> § Initial development of software programme by IT team
>> § One phone connection to audio bridge
>>
>> Recommendation: Taking into the accessibility for audiocast participants;
>> staff resources required to implement and maintain the system; and, the
>> overall costs of the different options, ICANN Staff would like to propose to
>> run a trial with the ‘automated audiocast stream via web-site’ option
>> (option 4) to see whether this system would meet the needs identified by the
>> GNSO Council. To this end, our IT Team is in the process of developing a
>> prototype software programme that it hopes to try out during the next GNSO
>> Council meeting on 15 July. On the basis of this trial, ICANN Staff would be
>> able to assess, based on feedback from the GNSO Council, audiocast
>> participants and a technical assessment, whether additional changes or
>> improvements are required.
>>
>> We look forward to receiving your feedback and will be available to answer
>> any questions you might have during our next meeting on 15 July.
>>
>> With best regards,
>>
>> Marika
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> <http://www.piercelaw.edu/>
>>
***********************************************************
William J. Drake
Senior Associate
Centre for International Governance
Graduate Institute of International and
Development Studies
Geneva, Switzerland
william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.graduateinstitute.ch/cig/drake.html
www.linkedin.com/in/williamjdrake
***********************************************************
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|