Re: [council] Fwd: Postponing or amending MOTION ON ENHANCING THE TRANSPARENCY OF GNSO COUNCIL?

[Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Bill,

The registrars would like to see numbers first. Let's discuss when this point 
comes up in today's agenda.

Stéphane

Le 23 juin 2010 à 11:37, William Drake a écrit :

> Hi Stephane,
> 
> Looks familiar…:-)  But I'm a bit unclear as to whether it's really necessary 
> anymore.  As noted we've been told by quite a few people that web 
> audiocasting from a teleconference is doable and ought to be quite 
> affordable, and Chuck has said that while the registries would prefer to know 
> just how much it would cost, they're be prepared to support it either way.  
> So the question is, are there a lot of folks who really feel we need a number 
> first, or shall we just pull the trigger and send a nice signal from 
> Brussels?  Again, I will do whatever makes folks happy, but if there's not a 
> real contingent for delaying then why bother?
> 
> Bill
> 
> On Jun 23, 2010, at 11:29 AM, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:
> 
>> I would like to propose the following amendment as friendly on Bill's motion 
>> (agenda item 7.2).
>> 
>> Bill, Olga, would you accept as friendly?
>> 
>> Stéphane
>> 
>> Début du message réexpédié :
>> 
>>>> RESOLVED that the Council asks staff to determine the costs associated 
>>>> with audiocasting all GNSO Council teleconference meetings (in addition to 
>>>> being recorded) so that members of the community can listen in real time. 
>>>> In making this determination, staff shall assess the services and prices 
>>>> of external suppliers, as well the cost of providing such services 
>>>> internally through ICANN's own network operations.  Staff is asked to 
>>>> provide cost information on the available options to the Council prior to 
>>>> its meeting on 15 July 2010.
>> 
>