<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] Draft Changes to String Similarity Review Proposed by GNSO Council - Public Comments Requested
- To: Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] Draft Changes to String Similarity Review Proposed by GNSO Council - Public Comments Requested
- From: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 10:06:17 -0700
- Accept-language: fr-FR, en-US
- Acceptlanguage: fr-FR, en-US
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcsLGryFq3pOSBXQSc6dFUpNoBO9sA==
- Thread-topic: Draft Changes to String Similarity Review Proposed by GNSO Council - Public Comments Requested
http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-11jun10-en.htm
Draft Changes to String Similarity Review Proposed by GNSO Council - Public
Comments Requested
11 June 2010
On 10 June, the GNSO Council passed a resolution requesting that a 21-day
public comment period
http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/public-comment-201007-en.htm#string-similarity-amendment
be opened regarding a proposal to send the following letter be sent to Kurt
Pritz, Senior Vice President, Services, copy to the ICANN Board, recommending
that the Draft Applicant Guidebook version IV section on "Outcomes of the
String Similarity Review" be amended to allow applicants to request an Extended
Review under applicable terms similar to those provided for other issues such
as "DNS Stability: String Review Procedure". The GNSO Council further
recommends that a section be added on "String Similarity - Extended Review"
that parallels other such sections in Module 2.
The text of the GNSO Council resolution and draft letter may be found here
http://gnso.icann.org/correspondence/council-resolution-proposed-letter-dagv4-ext-rev-11jun10-en.pdf
[PDF, 12 KB].
Background Information
The GNSO Council is concerned that the Draft Applicant Guidebook, Version 4
does not include an Extended Review option for strings that fail the initial
evaluation for confusing similarity and likelihood to confuse. The GNSO Council
in Recommendation #2 of the GNSO Final Report on the Introduction of New gTLDs
in September 2007 intended to prevent confusing and detrimental similarity and
not similarity that could serve the users of the Internet. More recently, the
IDNG Drafting Team established by the GNSO Council has discussed various
circumstances where applicants for strings that may be designated as
confusingly similar in the initial evaluation may be able to present a case
showing that the string is not detrimentally similar to another string. The
Council proposes that a letter be sent recommending changes to the Draft
Applicant Guidebook to address this concern.
Further Information
Full information about the new gTLD program may be found at: www.icann.org.
Comments are due by 2 July 2010.
Staff Responsible: Liz Gasster
Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat
gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://gnso.icann.org
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|