<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] GNSO Council meeting with the AT Review Team
- To: <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [council] GNSO Council meeting with the AT Review Team
- From: "Mary Wong" <MWong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 17:02:40 -0400
- In-reply-to: <C8FFD98530207F40BD8D2CAD608B50B40294B195@mtldsvr01.DotMobi.local>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <1220DEFC-AAEF-410C-87C6-9497B261DCEC@indom.com> <C8FFD98530207F40BD8D2CAD608B50B40294B195@mtldsvr01.DotMobi.local>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I "third" Bill's and Caroline's sentiments, and note that the current
schedule for Brussels seems to show 2 meetings between the GAC and the
RT (three if you count the one between the RT and the GAC-Board joint
working group).
Cheers
Mary
Mary W S Wong
Professor of Law & Chair, Graduate IP Programs
Franklin Pierce Law Center
Two White Street
Concord, NH 03301
USA
Email: mwong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Phone: 1-603-513-5143
Webpage: http://www.piercelaw.edu/marywong/index.php
Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network
(SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584
>>>
From: "Caroline Greer" <cgreer@xxxxxxxxx>
To:Stéphane Van Gelder<stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>,
<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 6/2/2010 5:38 AM
Subject: RE: [council] GNSO Council meeting with the AT Review Team
Stéphane,
The Registries Stakeholder Group plans to meet with the RT on Monday of
ICANN week.
As Bill states, if we can find the time, I think it would do no harm
for the Council to meet with the RT. This is a critical piece of work
for the community.
Many thanks,
Caroline.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder
Sent: 01 June 2010 21:58
To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Council
Subject: [council] GNSO Council meeting with the AT Review Team
Councillors,
The Council chairs have been approached by the Accountability and
Transparency Review Team with an enquiry about a possible meeting in
Brussels.
They told us they are having a public forum session on the Monday
afternoon, but that they would also be happy to meet with ACs and SOs
directly. They are trying to arrange a meeting with the GNSO SGs, but
wanted to know if the Council as a whole was interested in meeting. They
are meeting with the Board, the GAC and ALAC on Sunday afternoon and
asked whether the GNSO Council could meet with them on Sunday morning.
However, it has proven impossible to fit such a meeting into our
already very full Brussels agenda without squeezing something else.
Therefore, it would be useful to get an idea of whether Councillors
think there would be value in meeting with the RT in light of the fact
that meetings are already arranged with each SG. In fact, it would also
be useful to know which SGs have a meeting planned with the RT.
If people do want the Council as a whole to meet with the RT, then the
question becomes where can we fit that meeting in our Brussels agenda.
On the other hand, if separate SG meetings are being arranged, is there
really any need for the Council as a whole to meet with the RT?
Stéphane
Pierce Law | University of New Hampshire - An Innovative Paternership
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|