<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] GNSO Council meeting with the AT Review Team
- To: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [council] GNSO Council meeting with the AT Review Team
- From: William Drake <william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 10:37:53 +0200
- Cc: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Council" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <1220DEFC-AAEF-410C-87C6-9497B261DCEC@indom.com>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <1220DEFC-AAEF-410C-87C6-9497B261DCEC@indom.com>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi Stéphane
On Jun 1, 2010, at 10:58 PM, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:
>
> Councillors,
>
> The Council chairs have been approached by the Accountability and
> Transparency Review Team with an enquiry about a possible meeting in Brussels.
>
> They told us they are having a public forum session on the Monday afternoon,
> but that they would also be happy to meet with ACs and SOs directly. They are
> trying to arrange a meeting with the GNSO SGs, but wanted to know if the
> Council as a whole was interested in meeting. They are meeting with the
> Board, the GAC and ALAC on Sunday afternoon and asked whether the GNSO
> Council could meet with them on Sunday morning.
>
> However, it has proven impossible to fit such a meeting into our already very
> full Brussels agenda without squeezing something else. Therefore, it would be
> useful to get an idea of whether Councillors think there would be value in
> meeting with the RT in light of the fact that meetings are already arranged
> with each SG. In fact, it would also be useful to know which SGs have a
> meeting planned with the RT.
NCSG will meet with the RT, but the time will undoubtedly be taken up
completely with concerns specific to us (there being a lot). We probably won't
be able to get into anything pertaining to concerns of the Council or larger
community. So for us at least, a meeting would not be redundant. Personally I
think it could be very useful, the RT really does need more input and data
points to work with.
>
> If people do want the Council as a whole to meet with the RT, then the
> question becomes where can we fit that meeting in our Brussels agenda. On the
> other hand, if separate SG meetings are being arranged, is there really any
> need for the Council as a whole to meet with the RT?
Is there a revised draft schedule somewhere reflecting the most recent changes
you mentioned?
Bill
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|