RE: [council] MOTION TO CREATE JOINT SO/AC WORKING GROUP ON NEW GTLD APPLICANT SUPPORT

["Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Chuck,

So I assume then that my "unfriendly" amendment will be voted on prior
to the motion, correct?

Tim 
 
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [council] MOTION TO CREATE JOINT SO/AC WORKING GROUP ON
NEW GTLD APPLICANT SUPPORT
From: Olga Cavalli <olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, March 30, 2010 8:20 pm
To: Adrian Kinderis <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>, "Gomes, Chuck"
<cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>, GNSO Council
<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Hi,
I do not see it as a friendly amendment.
Regards
Olga

2010/3/30 Adrian Kinderis <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Olga?
 
Do you see this as a friendly amendment?
 
Adrian Kinderis


 
 
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Rafik Dammak
Sent: Wednesday, 31 March 2010 3:33 AM
To: Gomes, Chuck
Cc: Tim Ruiz; GNSO Council
Subject: Re: [council] MOTION TO CREATE JOINT SO/AC WORKING GROUP ON NEW
GTLD APPLICANT SUPPORT



Hello,


unfortunately, I cannot see it as friendly amendment.



Regards



Rafik
2010/3/30 Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Rafik/Olga,

Do you accept this as a friendly amendment?

Chuck

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tim Ruiz
> Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 4:20 PM
> To: GNSO Council
> Subject: RE: [council] MOTION TO CREATE JOINT SO/AC WORKING
> GROUP ON NEW GTLD APPLICANT SUPPORT
>
>
> Since it seems to be agreed that what is intended is to look
> for funding opportunities outside of ICANN's own budget to
> possibly resolve this concern, I would like to make that
> evident in the motion and propose this friendly amendment:
>
> Add the following to the first Resolve:
>
> keeping in mind ICANN's requirement to recover the costs of
> new gTLD applications and on-going services to new gTLDs
>
> So the first Resolve would read:
>
> Resolved, that the GNSO Council supports the formation of a
> joint SO/AC working group to respond to the Board's request
> by developing a sustainable approach to providing support to
> new gTLD applicants requiring assistance in applying for and
> operating new gTLDS, keeping in mind ICANN's requirement to
> recover the costs of new gTLD applications and on-going
> services to new gTLDs;
>
>
> Tim
>
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [council] MOTION TO CREATE JOINT SO/AC WORKING GROUP
> ON NEW GTLD APPLICANT SUPPORT
> From: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, March 24, 2010 9:43 am
> To: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Council GNSO
> <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Hello,
>
> I want to submit motion to approve joint SO/AC council
> working group on new gTLD applicant support the motion
> document is attached.
>
>
> Regards
>
>
> Rafik
>
>
>