<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] MOTION TO CREATE JOINT SO/AC WORKING GROUP ON NEW GTLD APPLICANT SUPPORT
- To: "GNSO Council " <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [council] MOTION TO CREATE JOINT SO/AC WORKING GROUP ON NEW GTLD APPLICANT SUPPORT
- From: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 13:19:41 -0700
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Reply-to: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Web-Based Email 5.2.09
Since it seems to be agreed that what is intended is to look for funding
opportunities outside of ICANN's own budget to possibly resolve this
concern, I would like to make that evident in the motion and propose
this friendly amendment:
Add the following to the first Resolve:
keeping in mind ICANN’s requirement to recover the costs of new gTLD
applications and on-going services to new gTLDs
So the first Resolve would read:
Resolved, that the GNSO Council supports the formation of a joint SO/AC
working group to respond to the Board’s request by developing a
sustainable approach to providing support to new gTLD applicants
requiring assistance in applying for and operating new gTLDS, keeping in
mind ICANN’s requirement to recover the costs of new gTLD applications
and on-going services to new gTLDs;
Tim
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [council] MOTION TO CREATE JOINT SO/AC WORKING GROUP ON NEW
GTLD APPLICANT SUPPORT
From: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, March 24, 2010 9:43 am
To: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Council GNSO
<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hello,
I want to submit motion to approve joint SO/AC council working group on
new gTLD applicant support
the motion document is attached.
Regards
Rafik
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|