<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] Comments on the establishment of a "DNS-CERT"
- To: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [council] Comments on the establishment of a "DNS-CERT"
- From: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 17:24:33 +0900
- Cc: GNSO Council <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=rvq1UH8ekTx98yOmnd1k9VSFG3wCBzFBvJdwsHck2uE=; b=x4IbDDKn5t8BWB+sICAozRDar9kH/LYLIUwRruxqYg4D+Qfwzc6ZgSzTwokwiqaPkd Cf+NGJ6qPYRqni4tGDwW4GK5RfuOo7dVFy2Kner/HAiNN6r2VgRxD9zhLyErFPqOGvJ6 aBMkvzNG8t/RzbFLTZtdZZa3nQoBEvWcMP4X8=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=RCYXb1WaZ600Iogrw8pt9hZjzw5VsS2KmkJNHtevicPqhIuCMCiA3dMxv5/SCB7YIU FotOk7xscQiLqFrX/CWWEbjaQTdFCJCCiE6YEwzz/XMMidQadXMOP1/LnGHkiYa6Ks4n IAzV93KFpZHq1WtdoRT81gi3q9nHNJ6gCOdS8=
- In-reply-to: <046F43A8D79C794FA4733814869CDF07032730EE@dul1wnexmb01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <046F43A8D79C794FA4733814869CDF07032730EE@dul1wnexmb01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi Chuck,
no objection. I attended the related session during ICANN meeting in
Nairobi, and I agree with many points expressed by ccNSO members there.
Regards
Rafik
2010/3/23 Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> <<DNS-CERT Letter Draft 22 Mar 10.doc>>
>
> Attached is a draft letter from Chris Disspain, Cheryl Langdon-Orr and
> myself intended for Peter Dengate-Thrush and Rod Beckstrom and also to be
> posted on the ICANN Public Comment site for the DNS-Cert consultation. As
> you know, the comment period is currently scheduled to end on 29 March, so
> there is only one week left. Note that the letter is just slightly over one
> page long so it is a quick read. The main elements are: 1) much more detail
> is needed; 2) a 15-day extension to the public comment period is requested;
> 3) a joint SO/AC WG be formed to investigate the CERT idea. I personally
> support the comments and requests in this letter and believe they are
> consistent with GNSO concerns, but I would like to make reasonably sure that
> that is the case.
>
> Does anyone object to me signing this letter in my role as GNSO Council
> Chair? If so, please let me know in the next 48 hours (i.e., by COB on
> Wednesday, 24 March) so that this letter can be sent with enough lead time
> to accommodate the request to extend the comment period by 15 days.
>
> Chuck
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|