RE: [council] RE: AoC Reveiw Team Re-do...

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

How much is "some support"?
 
Chuck


________________________________

        From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tim Ruiz
        Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 2:44 PM
        To: GNSO Council 
        Subject: [council] RE: AoC Reveiw Team Re-do...
        
        
        
        More explicitly, what I'm asking each SG to do during their
deliberations/voting on this is to note all the candidates that have at
least some support from their SG so the option below can be considered
by the Council. 
        

        Tim  

                -------- Original Message --------
                Subject: AoC Reveiw Team Re-do...
                From: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
                Date: Mon, March 08, 2010 1:36 pm
                To: "GNSO Council " <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
                
                Given what Janis and Peter said during the AoC Q&A this
morning
                including the fact that the review team will be larger
than first
                proposed, we should re-think our endorsement process and
only be
                considering who if any of the twelve we do not endorse
and submit the
                rest.
                
                I think this should be kept simple. If any of the
candidates have
                endorsement of at least one SG they are included. The
names would be
                submitted showing the SG(s) endorsement. This only
slightly changes what
                the SG are required to do (reverses it), and resolves
the gender and
                geographic issues since it leaves it to Janis and Peter
to sort out.
                
                This also gives the most number of candidates an
opportunity to be
                considered and give the GNSO the best shot at being
fully represented on
                the RT.
                
                
                Tim