<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] Friendly amendments to VI motion
- To: <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] Friendly amendments to VI motion
- From: "Mary Wong" <MWong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2010 07:34:31 -0500
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi everyone
For some reason I didn't get Tim's email proposing further amendments to the
amended VI motion, so forgive me if I'm getting something wrong. I just wanted
to ask Tim if he could explain the request. As I read it as forwarded to me,
there seems a possibility that dropping the reference to the WG Chair from the
first sentence raises the possibility that a WG member who is NOT the Chair
could go directly to seek Council approval, bypassing the Chair whose role it
is to achieve consensus amongst the WG.
Cheers
Mary
Mary W S Wong
Professor of Law & Chair, Graduate IP Programs
Franklin Pierce Law Center
Two White Street
Concord, NH 03301
USA
Email: mwong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Phone: 1-603-513-5143
Webpage: http://www.piercelaw.edu/marywong/index.php
Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at:
http://ssrn.com/author=437584
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|