ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[council] RE: reason for abstention

  • To: "'Glen de Saint Géry'" <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>, "'GNSO Council '" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [council] RE: reason for abstention
  • From: "Mike Rodenbaugh" <icann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 07:50:04 -0800
  • In-reply-to: <05B243F724B2284986522B6ACD0504D7D33EB60D8D@EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Organization: Rodenbaugh Law
  • References: <05B243F724B2284986522B6ACD0504D7D33EB60D8D@EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org>
  • Reply-to: <icann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: Acqwsvy8lPib4356S9m1FfIVDJ/2XwAxy/ow
Thanks Glen, copying the Council as well.

I abstained from the vote on AoC RT selections due to the gender diversity
provisions, which I think are unfair and unnecessary.  ICANN is open to
everyone and always has been open to everyone.  So I see no reason why ICANN
should be promoting one group of people over any other, based solely on
irrelevant personal characteristics such as gender, race, religion or sexual
orientation, etc.  

Mike Rodenbaugh
RODENBAUGH LAW
tel/fax:  +1 (415) 738-8087
http://rodenbaugh.com 

-----Original Message-----
From: Glen de Saint Géry [mailto:Glen@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 7:57 AM
To: icann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Glen de Saint Géry
Subject: reason for abstention

Hi Mike,

Can you please give your reasons for abstention on Item 4 motion?
Thanks so much.

Glen

Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat
gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://gnso.icann.org
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>