ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[council] FW: Request to post - GAC/GNSO joint meeting

  • To: Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [council] FW: Request to post - GAC/GNSO joint meeting
  • From: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 06:52:44 -0800
  • Accept-language: fr-FR, en-US
  • Acceptlanguage: fr-FR, en-US
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcqvyCVleLrkkq4hTdGBU0+KNk/aKQAC/ymwAADP3oAANTGZkAAAjbXg
  • Thread-topic: Request to post - GAC/GNSO joint meeting


Forwarded From: Rosemary To: Gomes, Chuck; William Drake; Glen de Saint Géry; 
Stéphane Van Gelder; KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx; Glen de Saint Géry; Cavalli, Olga
Subject: Request to post - GAC/GNSO joint meeting


Glen

I think I have made the right changes - 2am here - would youpost this doc for 
me pls?

Cheers

Rosemary


-----Original Message-----
From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thu 2/18/2010 1:16 AM
To: Gomes, Chuck; William Drake; Glen de Saint Géry; Rosemary Sinclair; 
Stéphane Van Gelder; KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx; Glen de Saint Géry; Cavalli, Olga
Subject: RE: Drafting team to prepare for the GAC/GNSO joint meeting

Here's the redline version I sent earlier in the week.  If no one objects, 
let's post a clean version of this and send it to the Council ASAP.

Glen - Can you do that?  If someone want to make changes, please do so.  I am 
about to head to the airport so will not be able to do much for a few hours.  
Don't wait for me.

Chuck


________________________________

        From: Gomes, Chuck
        Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 8:23 AM
        To: William Drake; Glen de Saint Géry; Rosemary Sinclair; Stéphane Van 
Gelder; KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx; Glen de Saint Géry; Cavalli, Olga
        Subject: RE: Drafting team to prepare for the GAC/GNSO joint meeting


        I proposed a final version and was waiting for feedback from others on 
this list.  If you are okay with what I did, please distribute it Bill in 
Rosemary's absence (she is not available until Thursday her time).  If not, 
make any changes and send it.

        I am traveling today and will have limited email access.

        Chuck


________________________________

                From: William Drake [mailto:william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
                Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 6:58 AM
                To: Gomes, Chuck; Glen de Saint Géry; Rosemary Sinclair; 
Stéphane Van Gelder; KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx; Glen de Saint Géry; Cavalli, Olga
                Subject: Re: Drafting team to prepare for the GAC/GNSO joint 
meeting


                This is on the agenda for tomorrow's call, shouldn't we send it 
to the Council to see prior?





                                        1. New gTLD Implementation &EOI
                                        Discussion of any specific and 
actionable recommendations on, for example:
                                        *any remaining concerns with respect to 
geographic & property protections
                                        *the utility of the studies proposed by 
the GAC, and the foreseen negative effects if they are not completed pre-launch
                                        *how categorization could work[Gomes, 
Chuck]  I know there are some in the GAC, in particular Bertrand, who still are 
pushing this, but I don't think it has much of chance to be considered so I 
think it would be a poor use of time and could take a lot of time as well.  If 
they bring it up, we cannot avoid that but I would not recommend we bring it up.
                                        *desirable fee structures
                                        *desired timeline for the roll out of 
new gTLDs

                        I was listing topics GAC has raised as indicators of 
the pool from which we could draw.  Obviously there won't be able to discuss 
all of these irrespective of whether there are two topics or three.  In that 
context, I didn't think it was up to us to judge which we considered 
meritorious or likely to go anywhere, as some government might object to us 
pruning.  But if people think doing so is ok in terms of sensitivities and 
optics, fine by me.


                                        2.  Affirmation of Commitments
                                        Discussion of perspectives on:
                                        *the meaning of public interest in 
relation to ICANN's identity and mission
                                        *the operationalization of public 
interest standards in relation to the work programs of ICANN's various bodies
                                        *specific accountability and 
transparency considerations with respect to GNSO's policy dev process

                                        3.  ICANN in the Wider International 
Environment
                                        Discussion of the relationship to ICANN 
in general and to GAC policies and principles in particular of:
                                        *the ongoing intergovernmental 
discussions (e.g. in the ITU and CSTD[Gomes, Chuck]  what is CSTD )

                        The UN Commission on Science and Technology for 
Development http://www.unctad.org/Templates/Page.asp?intItemID=2696


                                        concerning Enhanced Cooperation on 
Globally Applicable Public Policy Principles
                                        *the various other proposals that have 
been advanced in the ITU and could be taken up by its October 2010 
Plenipotentiary Conference concerning, e.g. the provision of registry services, 
the harmonization and coordination of ccTLD policies, internationalized domain 
names, the interface between international laws and treaties and Internet 
governance, security and stability, dispute resolution,  and so on


                        I cut nondiscrimination, that's more about traffic than 
ICANN

                        Shall we send this to council and get some feedback?



Attachment: GAC-GNSO draft agenda for Nairobi 18 Feb 10.doc
Description: GAC-GNSO draft agenda for Nairobi 18 Feb 10.doc



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>