<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] Vertical Integration
- To: GNSO Council List <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] Vertical Integration
- From: Adrian Kinderis <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 15:33:48 +1100
- Accept-language: en-US, en-AU
- Acceptlanguage: en-US, en-AU
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcqvimYBpcuQ33kxRn22yPHltu4pMw==
- Thread-topic: Vertical Integration
Council,
Further to my previous email please see the following from the ICANN website
(http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-4-15feb10-en.htm);
Vertical Integration (aka Registry/Registrar Separation)
Based on debates on the subject held at the ICANN meetings in Seoul, discussion
during the consultation with certain community representatives held on 7
January 2010 in Washington D.C., and ongoing study, ICANN will propose for
community comment a new registry-registrar separation model for inclusion in
the next draft of the gTLD agreement. Additionally, the Board and community
members will be discussing the issue in Nairobi.
ICANN are proposing what?
Huh?
What about the PDP?
I'm still confused!
Adrian Kinderis
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|