RE: [council] FW: Organizational Reviews - 2 Applications for AoC Reviews - GNSO Endorsement -

[Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>]

Dear Councillors,

It has been confirmed that both applicants have been informed  that on February 
18th, additional information requirements would be identified and requested 
from them.

Thank you.
Kind regards,
Glen


-----Original Message-----
From: William Drake ] 


Hi Glen,

Thanks for passing these along.  Have they been told that they'll need to 
resubmit applications after the 18th that address the additional GNSO 
requirements (assuming Council approve those)?  

Either way, these early apps point to a tweak we should make to the Proposed 
Process.  We don't presently say anything about how apps will be allocated to 
the up to six slots.  Perhaps we don't need to specify all the gory details, 
but at a minimum it would be helpful if the text asked applicants to say which 
SG, if any, they'd like to be nominated by.  (If having been asked they still 
give no preference the Evaluation Team or Council-TBD--would have to make a 
determination in accordance with a procedure still to be settled and proposed 
by the DT).  In these cases we have a CORE person and an IPR lawyer so maybe 
it's straightforward, but maybe not...

One other thought: would it perhaps make sense to post complete applications to 
the web and then direct people to them there, rather than emailing zip files 
around between the secretariat, council, SG chairs, SG members, etc?  And 
beyond the transactions costs issue, there's also a transparency dimension-the 
apps should be accessible to the public, as envisioned by ICANN's call.

Best,

BIll

On Feb 15, 2010, at 4:54 PM, Glen de Saint Géry wrote:

> 
> Forwarded From: Alice Jansen 
> 
> 
> Good morning,
> 
> In line with Chuck Gomes' request (see below), you will find enclosed two 
> endorsement applications for Affirmation of Commitments reviews from 
> candidates that indicated GNSO as their SO. 
> 
> Please note that although candidates have specified an order of preference 
> for the reviews to be performed, both selected the 'Accountability and 
> Transparency' review which Mr. Gomes stresses in his email.
> 
> The compressed folders attached to this email contain the applicants' CV and 
> motivation letter.
> 
> The application deadline for the 'Accountability and Transparency' review 
> will expire on February the 22nd, midnight UTC, but as you know the GNSO 
> Council will have until the 1st March to endorse the candidatures.
> 
> Best regards
> 
> Alice
> 
> Alice E. Jansen
> --------------------------
> ICANN
> Assistant, Organizational Reviews
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> From: Gomes, Chuck 
> Sent: Wednesday, 10 February, 2010 00:51
> To: Marco Lorenzoni
> Cc: gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: GNSO Request
> 
> Marco,
> 
> The GNSO requests that applications received from volunteers for the 
> Accountability and Transparency RT be forwarded to the GNSO Secretariat as 
> soon as possible after receipt for distribution to the Council list, SGs and 
> other GNSO organization lists.  If applications are received prior to 
> finalization of the GNSO endorsement process on 18 February, it would be 
> helpful if the applicants seeking GNSO endorsement were informed that 
> additional GNSO information requirements will be identified on 18 February 
> and will be requested at that time along with the CV and motivation letter.
> If there are any concerns with this, please let me know.
> 
> Thanks for your assistance.
> 
> Chuck Gomes
> <Eric Brunner-Williams.zip><Victoria McEvedy.zip>